My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/1985 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1985
>
04/22/1985 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:02:42 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:48:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/22/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Schue emphasized that surveys have indicated that citizens have a great <br />deal of interest in the library. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten proposed that the council approve a public education campaign about <br />the Eugene Agenda, decide how much should be provided for each of the pro- <br />jects, and then decide how the program should be presented to the voters. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman suggested councilors hold "town hall" meetings to discuss the <br />projects, their cost, and ways to finance them with the public. Mr. Rutan <br />1 iked that idea. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mayor Obie, several councilors said they did not <br />favor a property tax, but Mr. Hansen said it should remain an option. <br />Ms. Wooten supported an income tax and an employee payroll tax. She and <br />Ms. Ehrman opposed a utility tax. <br /> <br />Answering another question from Mayor Obie, Ms. Wooten, Ms. Ehrman, <br />Mr. Holmer, Mr. Rutan, and Ms. Bascom indicated some support for an income tax <br />or an employee payroll tax. Ms. Bascom said they are easy taxes to collect. <br />Ms. Ehrman and Ms. Schue supported raising as much money as possible with one <br />tax. Ms. Schue was comfortable with the income tax, but had some reservations <br />about the employee payroll tax because Lane Transit District levies a payroll <br />tax. Mr. Holmer preferred a personal income tax because it would be paid on <br />total income by everyone who lives in the city. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen proposed a package which would be composed of an employee payroll <br />tax, an income tax, and a property tax. Each tax would provide one third of <br />the needed income. He favored broadening the tax base and noted the employee <br />payroll tax would affect people who work in the city and live outside it. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Wong said he had not discussed a <br />Lane County one-percent income tax with Lane County representatives. <br />Ms. Wooten suggested Springfield, Eugene, and Lane County might each levy an <br />income tax. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie suggested a $30 million general obligation bond which would provide <br />$6 million annually. Each year $3.5 million could be taken out and the rest <br />used for improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen emphasized that the cost of the projects should be clarified before <br />anything is presented to the voters. <br /> <br />Summarizing, Mayor Obie said there was some consensus that an employee payroll <br />tax and/or income tax should be used to fund the annual $8.3 million to <br />$11 million revenue needs. He asked each councilor to indicate what should be <br />funded. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten would like to fund all of the Eugene Agenda, the library and a <br />swimming pool, a reasonable replacement of Federal Revenue Sharing funds, and <br />a part of the Capital Improvement Program. She suggested $4 million be <br />alloted for the replacement of Federal Revenue sharing funds and the Capital <br />Improvement Program. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />April 22, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.