My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/1985 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1985
>
04/22/1985 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:02:58 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:48:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/22/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Discussing the sidewalk vending part of the ordinance, Ms. Smernoff noted that <br />administrative rules had been used since December of 1983 to regulate street <br />vending on public sidewalks. In December, several people in the 13th and <br />Kincaid area indicated concerns about the administrative rules. In response, <br />the staff conducted a survey, held a citizenls forum, and proposed the <br />revisions before the council. Ms. Smernoff said the policy statements that <br />the council is considering will guide the staff and City Manager in implemen- <br />tation. The proposed rules are temporary and will be made permanent in 180 <br />days. <br /> <br />Ms. Smernoff said the reV1Slons indicate that food and beverage vendors should <br />be 150 linear feet from a restaurant and flower vendors should be 150 feet <br />from a flower shop. To reduce congestion, the revisions indicate there will <br />be only one vendor on each quarter of a block. She said two or three vendors <br />will be able to locate on the east and west side of Kincaid Street north of <br />13th Avenue. <br /> <br />Replying to Mr. Holmer, Ms. Smernoff said the revisions will not control <br />flower sales to people in vehicles in the street. Answering Ms. Ehrman, <br />Ms. Smernoff said the intent of the ordinance is to regulate street vendors of <br />food, beverage, and flowers only. Responding to Ms. Bascom, Ms. Smernoff said <br />a "grandfather clause" had been considered and not recommended because the <br />congestion at 13th and Kincaid needed to be addressed. The revisions apply to <br />all the City except the downtown mall. She noted that the revisions include a <br />prohibition of vendors within 100 feet of a freeway ramp anywhere in the <br />city. Ms. Bascom commented that special rules might be developed for the 13th <br />and Kincaid area. <br /> <br />Replying to Ms. Wooten, Ms. Smernoff said there are usually four or five <br />street vendors at 13th Avenue and Kincaid Street. The revisions indicate one <br />vendor can be located on the west side of Kincaid in the half block immedi- <br />ately north of 13th. One vendor could be located in each of the quarter <br />blocks on the east side of Kincaid Street north of 13th Avenue. No vendors <br />could be located on the southwest or southeast corners of the intersection <br />because the sidewalk is too narrow. The staff observed the 13th and Kincaid <br />area in all kinds of weather. The access of handicapped people has been <br />inhibited by the location of the street vendors. Handicapped access ramps are <br />sometimes offset from the crosswalks, and so the revisions require street <br />vendors to be 10 feet from handicapped parking spaces and access ramps. A <br />5-foot wide expanse of sidewalk is necessary to ensure that people have room <br />to pass each other while walking. <br /> <br />Referring to Section 3.340, Mr. Holmer suggested the objective of the minimum <br />amount of insurance and the extent of the insurance required of street vendors <br />be specified in the ordinance. He also suggested the ordinance indicate the <br />basis for the application fee. Ms. Smernoff said the application should cover <br />the cost of reviewing the application and that language could be added to the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen wondered why a Refuse and Recycling Board will be established if it <br />is to meet only when the City Manager wants it to meet. Ms. Smernoff said the <br />revisions indicate specific charges for the Refuse and Recycling Board. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 22, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.