Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Miller wondered if a market analysis had been done to determine the poten- <br />tial demand for this kind of subdivision. Ms. Brody said no such analysis <br />had taken place; an analysis at this point would show little more than an <br />economically-depressed market. There have been no specific comments from <br />developers. She said there are currently four mobile-home subdivisions within <br />the city, all of which contain some vacant lots. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Dorothy Anderson, Planning Commission Chairperson, offered background informa- <br />tion on the proposed code amendment. She said urban placement of mobile homes <br />had been a problem for some years. Legislative pressure had been brought to <br />bear on many communities to provide alternative, lower-cost housing. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission decided to experiment with newly developing areas, <br />since many people were rightly or wrongly concerned that mobile homes in <br />established neighborhoods could depress property values. She said people <br />buying into these areas would know in advance that they were settling into a <br />mixed area. Such an advantage would be absent in already established neigh- <br />borhoods. <br /> <br />Hearing no further requests to testify, Ms. Wooten closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen commended Ms. Anderson for her work in keeping the City Council <br />abreast of Planning Commission activities. Ms. Bascom expressed support for <br />the ordinance, saying it would provide for needed flexibility in housing <br />choices. Mr. Miller felt it was a misdirected ordinance, since talks with <br />developers had convinced him that mobile homes often bring down the price of <br />neighboring "stick-built" houses. On the other hand, such developments might <br />be appropriate in limited areas. He hoped that a review clause and criteria <br />for monitoring could be attached to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she looked somewhat askance at the ordinance but urged its <br />approval in good faith as an experiment. She agreed that a review date should <br />be attached, and recommended January 1, 1988. She asked staff to provide <br />information to council on a pro-active basis, especially regarding dense <br />developments of this kind in a particular part of the city. <br /> <br />CB 2823--An ordinance concerning mobile home regulations; <br />amending Section 9.268, 9.384, 9.386, 9.902, and 9.806 <br />of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Mr. Holmer, that the bill be read <br />the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous <br />consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this <br />time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Mr. Holmer that the bill be <br />approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion <br />carried 6:1, with Councilors Wooten, Hansen, Bascom, Ehrman, <br />Holmer, and Rutan voting aye; Councilor Miller voting nay. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 13, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />