06/19/1985 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Rutan suggested he and Ms. Wooten could share a position, but there did - not seem to be a need to do that. Res. No. 914--A resolution of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency creating an advisory committee to provide a recommendation on the establishment of a tax increment district in the Riverfront Park Study Area. Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to adopt the resol uti on. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. Ms. Wooten adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency. WORK SESSION Ms. Wooten convened a work session of the Eugene City Council. IV. DISCUSSION CONCERNING LCDC COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS--GOAL 5 (PUDDING CREEK) City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Planning Directo~ Susan Brody gave the staff report. e Ms. Brody noted that the council had a public hearing with the Lane County Board of Commissioners and representatives of the Springfield City Council about Goal 5 issues in certain areas between the urban growth boundary and the Metro Plan boundary. The Metro Plan did not receive acknowledgement from the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) for those areas. Ms. Brody said the Pudding Creek Heronry was the only area on which the elected officials disagreed. She distributed copies of a proposed Lane County ordinance to the councilors. She said the Lane County Commissioners decided to approve an operations management plan for the Pudding Creek Heronry, but they made three changes in the operations management plan recommended by the Metropolitan Area Plan Advisory Commission (MAPAC). The changes are: 1) Sand and gravel operations are prohibited in the buffer area until 1990. 2) The three-year assessment period will start again if the herons return during the initial three-year assessment period. 3) A master plan for the Howard Buford Recreation Area shall be completed within three years. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 19, 1985 Page 5