Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Ms. Bascom requested inform tion examining the possibil ity of a gas tax to <br /> e finance transportation projects, and Ms. Wooten requested a package examining <br /> alternatives to the income tax, such as putting the airport on a serial levy, <br /> withdrawing the Riverfront Project as self-financing, and re-examining options <br /> for the downtown project. Mr. Wong said a draft of a gas tax had been pre- <br /> pared last sumner. Ms. Wooten added that the 1 ibrary and the pool still were <br /> important to her, and she said she thought they would have to be financed <br /> either through community development block grant funds or through special bond <br /> mea sure son the ba 11 0 t. <br /> Mr. Whitlow said the council should let staff know as soon as possible if they <br /> intend to pursue other revenue sources, as it woul d require a lot of work <br /> before the deadl ine for ballot measures. <br /> Responding to Ms. Wootenls question, Mr. Wong said a 3 cent per gallon gas tax <br /> would yield about $1.5 million inside the city limits. <br /> Mr. Hol mer sa i d one person a t the meetings had pointed out how sna 11 the <br /> income tax alOOunt was and had suggested that no exemptions were needed. <br /> Mr. Wong sa i d the packet conta ined five scenarios of low-income credi ts or <br /> exemptions. He said exemptions would leave a portion of income untaxed, <br /> while credits would entail refunds of the tax liability owed. Mr. Wong said a <br /> separate credit form would be used for the city tax, and the instruction book- <br /> let woul d come out of City administra tive costs. He reviewed the various <br /> options and their losses, and he noted that the exemptions would involve a <br /> e discontinuity at the breaking point, meaning that the entire tax would be <br /> charged if the income amount is one dollar over the limit, and he said that <br /> was the reason for the sequential credits on the first two pages. <br /> Mr. Obie suggested getting the infornation to Mr. Miller. <br /> Mr. Holmer noted that the exemptions would benefit the high-income earner more <br /> drastically than the low-income earner. <br /> Responding to Mr. Obie IS question about regional funding of the airport, <br /> Mr. Wong sa i d about 38 percent of the income earned in Eugene wa s by non- <br /> resi dents. Ms. Ehrman said she had heard figures stating that about 40 per- <br /> cent of the airport business was from people outside of Eugene. <br /> Mr. Obie asked about financing capital projects by maintaining a fixed debt <br /> service levy. Mr. Wong distributed those analyses. Mr. Wong said about hal f <br /> of the outstanding debt would be paid off in the next five years, and he said <br /> r.t>ody's had expressed concern that Eugene was not issuing more debt. <br /> He said if the existing rate per thousand in debt service is mintained at <br /> $1.30/1,000, two scenarios were possible. Under version A, assuming no growth <br /> in assessed value, it would be 1996 before sufficient debt service would <br /> accrue annually to service the $10 million in airport bonds. Under version B, <br /> assuming annual growth of 5 percent, the amount probably would be realized by <br /> 1991 . Mr. Obie voiced the conclusion that that would not be a viable option <br /> because it was too far in the future. <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--City Council Dinner Session August 12, 1985 Page 6 <br />