Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Hansen said he also favored referring something with a good chance of <br /> e passing and that would make good use of resources for economic development. <br /> He said he recognized a general conclusion that the airport was important. He <br /> said the operations budget would lack $3 million this coming year, which <br /> needed to picked up or painful cuts in operations and capital improvements <br /> would be needed. He said he felt the infrastructure improvements and <br /> maintenance, including the airport, was necessary, but the library costs were <br /> too high, ill-advised, and premature. He said he supported going to voters <br /> with the two issues of the airport and shortfall replacement, and with a <br /> sunset provision written into the measure for implementation once the airport <br /> wa s bu i 1 t. <br /> Mr. Obie noted that the airport, CIP, and the library seemed to have fairly <br /> consistent support, with further discussion needed on the sunset provision, <br /> cost of operating the library, percentage of tax, dedication of revenue, and a <br /> low-income exemption. <br /> Mr. Obie outlined the costs of the airport project, saying needs started at <br /> $1.5 million/year and reduced gradually to nothing over 20 years. He sa i d th e <br /> CIP costs were $2.6 million, and administration costs and credits were $.5 <br /> mi 11 ion. He proposed putting the library costs in beginning at $125,OOO/year <br /> and increasing as the airport costs decrease over 20 years, leaving time to <br /> study location and feasibility. He said that would make total costs of about <br /> $4,625,000/year, which should convert to about a .4 percent income tax rate. <br /> He also said that would leave CIP somewhat undefined. <br /> e Mr. Wong said with a 1/2 percent rate, every $1,000 excluded meant a loss of <br /> about $.5 million, from a total of $6 million. Ms. Wooten said she was not <br /> interested in an exemption for everyone, only for those with low incomes. <br /> Mr. Obie said he had heard people express feelings that everyone should pay <br /> something a s a contributi on to the communi ty. <br /> Ms. Wooten said she thought the proposal was a good one, but issues remaining <br /> undecided were what was to be included in the unfunded CIP, downtown, <br /> low-income exemption or credit, and whether the library should go on a <br /> separate ballot measure. She said she did not favor a separate ballot measure <br /> for the library, as some people who did not see the need for airport expansion <br /> might support the library. She also said she was worried about a fallback <br /> position if the ballot measure failed in November. <br /> Ms. Ehrman suggested possibly scaling down the projections for the airport, <br /> saying some people had raised questions about the need for meeting rooms. <br /> Mr. Rutan said the bare minimum needed was $9 million, and he and Mr. Hansen <br /> were recommending $17.1 million, or $1.5 million/year. <br /> Ms. Ehrman also said Springfield's mayor had expressed interest in the gas <br /> tax, and that might be a fallback position for CIP or road funding. Mr. Obie <br /> agreed that a gas tax might be looked at in the future. <br /> Ms. Bascom said airport meeting rooms had been supported when it was clarified <br /> that only two rooms were planned. She also said another fallback position <br /> might include a property tax levy for the airport. She said she supported <br /> e those three projects because they had emerged with the most public support. <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council Revenue Work Session September 10, 1985 Pa ge 7 <br />