Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Ms. Schue and Mr. Hansen said they were persuaded by Mr. Rutan's statement. <br />- Res. No. 3944--A resolution authorizing annexation for property <br /> located southwest of Spring Boulevard and rezoning from County <br /> F-2 Forest Land District to City RA Suburban Residential <br /> District. <br /> Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to adopt the resolu- <br /> tion. Roll call vote. The motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br /> Final Order No. A/Z 85-2--A final order rezoning property <br /> located southwest of Spring Boulevard <br /> from County F-2 Forest Land District <br /> to City RA Suburban Residential Dis- <br /> trict. <br /> Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to approve the Final <br /> Order No. A/Z 85-2 rezoning property located southwest of Spring <br /> Boulevard from County F-2 Forest Land District to City RA <br /> Suburban Residential District. <br /> Ms. Ehrman moved, seconded by Ms. Wooten, to amend the motion to <br /> add the site review suffix to the RA Suburban Residential <br /> District for Tax Lot 2800 subject to the following concern: <br /> The site review should be for the sole purpose of resolving the <br />- future alignment of Spring Boulevard through Tax Lot 2800 con- <br /> necting to the existing Spring Boulevard to the north with the <br /> intent to protect the adjacant properties and minimize the <br /> disturbance of vegetation. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said limiting the site review to one concern will not burden the <br /> property. <br /> Mr. Hansen said he would oppose the amendment because the site review suffix <br /> will remain on the property. <br /> Answering a question from Mr. Miller, Mr. Croteau said the site review process <br /> was changed two years ago to permit a specific concern. When the concern has <br /> been met, site review procedures will not be required. The suffix could be <br /> eliminated in the future when the concern has been met. <br /> The amendment carried 5:2. Ms. Wooten, Ms. Schue, Mr. Miller, <br /> Ms. Ehrman, and Mr. Holmer voted aye. Mr. Hansen and Mr. Rutan <br /> voted nay. <br /> The amended motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br />- <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 14, 1985 Page 7 <br />