Laserfiche WebLink
effective demand for new housing: it is the local equilibrium of demand <br />factors, supply factors, and price. <br />In short, a housing needs analysis should make a distinction between <br />housing that people might need (a normative, social judgment) and what <br />the market will produce (an observable outcome). <br />Goal 10 does not make a clear distinction between the existing stock of <br />housing and new housing. Because a lot of Goal 10 (and Goal 9, the <br />Economy) is aimed at Goal 14 (Urbanization) and a determination of <br />whether more land should be added to urban growth boundaries, there is <br />usually more emphasis on new housing, which will require buildable land. <br />In essence, a Goal -10 evaluation looks at (1) new households that the <br />population forecasts presume will be living in a jurisdiction 20 years in the <br />future, (2) estimates a number of new ("needed") housing units, by type, <br />and (3) estimates the amount of land they will consume when they are <br />constructed. <br />Most housing market analyses and housing elements of comprehensive <br />plans in Oregon make forecasts of new demand (what housing units will <br />get built in response to market forces). Work by housing authorities is <br />more likely to address housing need for special classes, especially low- <br />income. It is the role of cities under Goal 10 to adopt and implement land <br />use policies that will encourage provision of housing units that meet the <br />needs of all residents. <br />It is unlikely that housing markets in any metropolitan area in the U.S. <br />provide housing to meet the needs of every household. Even many upper- <br />income households probably believe they "need" (want) more housing <br />than their wealth and income allows them to afford. A typical standard, <br />used by housing agencies around the country, is excess cost burden: does a <br />household spend more than 30% of its income on housing? But even that <br />standard may not comport with a common-sense notion of housing need: <br />if upper income households are spending 40% of their income on housing <br />because they are highly leveraged, betting on increases in property value, <br />and have substantial wealth that they can invest in mortgage payments, <br />do they have a housing need? <br />Independent of a strict legal interpretation, it is clear that any housing <br />agency is focused on more basic housing needs. At the extreme there is <br />homelessness: some people do not have any shelter at all. Close behind is <br />substandard housing (with health and safety problems), space problems <br />(the structure is adequate but overcrowded), and economic and social <br />problems (the structure is adequate in quality and size, but a household <br />has to devote so much of its income to housing payments that other <br />Page 10 ECONorthwest Part 11 — Eugene Housing Needs Analysis <br />