11/20/1985 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. --- . :\ -l,- 3. Preparation of a working paper to address archaeological sites listed in a U of 0 study submitted during the Mid-Period Review. Refer e to page 11-38 of MPC1s Report, Volume 2, proposed Policy 6. Note: the Eugene Planning Commission is recommending a change to Policy 6. 4. Removal of four floating nodes and th e Barger Drive/Belt Line refinement plan symbol from the Metro Plan Diagram and an indication on the Diagram of land use patterns adopted during local refinement planning processes. 5. Changes to designation of about five acres of property located at the intersection of Coburg and Cou nty Farm Roads from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial for an office complex. Refer to MPC Report, Volume 1, page 111-66, Index No. 8-9. 6. Changes to designation of about 133 acres from Light-Medium Industrial to Special Light Industrial. This site is located adjacent to the existing West Terry Special Light Industrial site north of 11th Avenue and east of Green Hill Road. Refer to MPC- Report, Volume 1, page 111-74, Index No. 8-13. 7. Expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary to include 40 acres immediately north of Barger Drive adjacent to the Eugene city limits. Change the designation from Agriculture to Low Density Residential. Refer to MPC Report, Volume 1, page I I 1-87, Index Number 8-20. Unresolved Issues - 1. A 78 acre site located north of Belt Line Road, South of Irving Road and east of the Northwest Expressway. The requested amendment was to change the Plan designation from Light-Medium Industrial to SpeCial-Light Industrial. Two positions were prepared by MPC for consideration: one was in support of the requested amendment and the other was to leave the designation as Light-Medium or change it to residential use. Key points on both positions are listed in MPC Report, Volume 2, page V-I. 2. An amendment req uested to create an industrial tract between Awbrey Lane and Meadow View. The request was to bring approximately 727 acres under one ownership into the Urban Growth Boundary and to designate the area as a "large-scale industrial park". MPC prepared two positions on this request; one is to include the area in a study of alternative growth areas to be conducted following the Mid-Period Review, the other is to include the area in the Urban Growth Boundary at this time. During the joint planning commission public hearing the applicant requested to withdraw their application from consideration during the Mid-Period Review. However, they would 1 i ke to maintain their application for consideration fo 11 owi ng the completion of the alternative grow~h study. (See attached letter.) pltbmeml e