Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> B. 10th and Oak Assessment District--Adjustment of Assessments <br /> e (memo, ordinance, background information distributed) <br /> City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the agenda item. Audit Supervisor Carol <br /> James presented the staff report. She said the proposed ordinance would <br /> reduce the original assessment by 30.86 percent, or a total of $652,869.38. <br /> Ms. James said the action would allow for the resolution of many long-standing <br /> issues, including the distribution of more than $1.8 million in excess net <br /> operating revenues and distribution of $800,000 in remaining funds. <br /> She presented a history of the assessment district. The 10th and Oak Special <br /> Benefit Assessment District was formed in 1966 when a $2 million levy was <br /> assessed against benefitted properties within the district to finance <br /> construction of a five-level parking facility. Ms. James outlined the <br /> district on a map. She said Bancroft bonds related to the assessment were <br /> sold in 1969, and the Overpark first opened for paid parking in fall 1969, <br /> although the structure was not completed until after that. A deficit <br /> assessment of $440,000 was levied in 1972 to finance completion of the <br /> structure, and related Bancroft bonds were sold in 1974. <br /> Code provisions at the time called for the rebate of excess operating <br /> revenues, less operating expenses, with the rebates to be applied as credits <br /> to the assessments outstanding. The structure's revenues had been projected <br /> to be sufficient to service the debt. <br /> Ms. James said the Downtown Develoment District was formed in 1972, and free <br /> e parking was established in surrounding areas, including the Overpark. To <br /> avoid double taxation of properties within the assessment district, a program <br /> of tax credits and deferrals was established as part of the DDD ad valorem and <br /> business and professional tax systems. Under the system, those in the 10th <br /> and Oak district received credits on their ODD ad valorem taxes in the amount <br /> of their annual assessment payments, including interest. Surrounding ODD <br /> properties were assessed higher ad valorem taxes to make up for the revenue <br /> deferred as credits to 10th and Oak district properties. Code provisions at <br /> that time called for reimbursement, to the ODD property owners who had paid <br /> the additional taxes, when the rebate from the Overpark net operating revenues <br /> was declared. Ms. James said no rebates had been declared before 1984. <br /> In March 1984, the council reviewed the issues and directed the call of the <br /> related Bancroft bonds remaining outstandtng. The council also directed staff <br /> to determine amounts available to be rebated' and to remove from the code <br /> provisions for future rebates and for the ODD-10th and Oak credit program. In <br /> June 1984, the council adopted ordinance 19253, declaring the rebate of $1.6 <br /> million in excess net operating revenues, an amount that included interest <br /> earnings on unrebated amounts. This ordinance set the stage for court action <br /> to confirm the council's interpretation of Eugene code provisions related to <br /> the rebate program. <br /> In July 1984, the council passed resolution 3868, directing staff to return to <br /> appropriate 10th and Oak assessment payers any funds remaining in the Overpark <br /> Fund after satisfaction of the bonds, distribution of the rebates, and <br /> satisfaction of any related administrative and legal costs. In August 1984, <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 25, 1985 Page 8 <br /> ~ <br />