Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Mr. Silvermoon said he did not think the long list of implementation criteria <br /> listed under policy 2 (Page 4) provided any guidance as to the order projects <br /> should be implemented, adding that they instead appeared to be a IIblanket <br /> catch-all.1I <br /> He said he was disturbed by TransPlan's IIwish listll of projects. He said <br /> short-term projects were estimated to cost considerably more than each <br /> government's projected revenue, not including other multi-jurisdictional <br /> projects. He also said while ambitious projections might be justified for the <br /> medium- and long-term, he thought they were fiscally irresponsible in the <br /> short-term, adding that he did not believe the community would support new <br /> taxes. He said he thought the project list should be condensed to include <br /> short-term projects that were intended and affordable. He also suggested <br /> changing the level of service goal from E to F to see which projects fell out. <br /> Mr. Silvermoon said he thought now was a good time, because of the Mid-Period <br /> Review of the Metro Plan, to make a needed examination of land-use patterns <br /> and their links to transportation. He also reminded listeners that figures <br /> for alternative mode use were goals, not projections, which could be revised <br /> in five years, and said he favored reaching for that vision. <br /> John Dreeszen, 1550 High #11, representing the Associated Students of the <br /> University of Oregon, expressed appreciation for the hours of staff and <br /> volunteer work spent on TransPlan, adding that ASUO was particularly impressed <br /> with the proposals for continued improvement of bikeways and alternative and <br /> mass transit, and noting support for the parking element. He said students <br />e recognized the continued primary use of automobiles but also the negative <br /> affect of on-street parking and parking structures on neighborhoods. <br /> He noted increasing student concern about the expansion of Sacred Heart <br /> Hospital at the expense of the neighborhood's character, and said students <br /> objected to claims by Sacred Heart of parallel interests between the two. <br /> He said ASUO regarded policies PK3, 4, 5, and 6 to be critical in establishing <br /> necessary control over the current trend to expand parking facilities. <br /> He said members of ASUO felt it was an excellent idea for employers to <br /> subsidize mass and alternative transit, rather than parking structures. <br /> He also said improvement of bicycle parking and locking structures would be <br /> helpful, and establishing an allowable number of new parking spaces for <br /> development seemed a reasonable way to limit paving of retail and residential <br /> space. He also said such suggestions might cause the demand for employee <br /> parking to decrease, opening up more space for patients. He suggested that <br /> incentives for employers, such as reducing the required contributions to the <br /> transit district, based on the subsidies of mass transit for employees was an <br /> excellent way to encourage cooperation, but should be backed up by limits and <br /> guidelines. He said Sacred Heart served a critical role in the community, and <br /> resources and their allocation must be shared, adding that neighbors of Sacred <br /> Heart felt the plan helped to strike a balance between their needs and those <br /> of the hospital. <br /> Dick Briggs, 80 West 23rd Avenue, Eugene Chamber of Commerce, said he felt <br /> TransPlan was good overall, but transit and alternative mode goals were too <br />e hi gh. He added that, because of the stringency of proposed policies required <br /> MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials Hearing--TransPlan December 4, 1985 Page 10 <br />