Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> i <br /> while still providing a new, 4-lane, limited access roadway. Existing 5th <br /> e Avenue would be'left intact, but would be discontinuous where the new roadway <br /> crosses it. Therefore, to assure adequate local circulation, Tyinn Street was <br /> presumed to be connected, and Wilson Street would be extended north to inter- <br /> sect with the new route. Local traffic would have to use the new roadway to <br /> travel between the western and eastern sections of the area presently connected <br /> by 5th Avenue. <br /> This alternative rates slightly lower than Alternative One on level of service <br /> and safety, due to the intersection geometrics and curving alignment. Right- <br /> of-way cost would be substantial. Construction cost would be slightly less <br /> than for Alternative One, since fewer traffic signals are required. <br /> Several businesses would be displaced, and there would be other impacts <br /> relating to proximity damages. The impact on local circulation would be fairly <br /> high, since 5th Avenue would no longer be a continuous local street. <br /> It is fairly likely that selection of this alternative would result in process <br /> delays, for the same reasons mentioned for the 5th-7th couplet. We consider <br /> it less likely to be accepted by the State and Federal agencies than Alterna- <br /> tive One or the elevated option; if it were accepted, however, the cost would <br /> be reasonable and funding might be forthcoming. <br /> Summary and Recommendation <br /> The Council is faced with a difficult choice. The staff feels it is very <br /> e important to keep the following points in mind: <br /> (1) The 6th-7th Extension is an absolutely essential component of <br /> our metropolitan transportation system. Without it, our adopted <br /> land use arrangement anticipated in the Metropolitan Plan cannot <br /> be implemented. <br /> (2) The extension is a new section of State highway, 5 1/2 miles in <br /> length. Although much of the route passes through undeveloped <br /> land, it is not possible to build a facility which improves <br /> access to West Eugene without any adverse impacts on businesses. <br /> (3) State and Federal project funds will be used to compensate <br /> businesses and property owners who are impacted by the selected <br /> alternative. Once the alignment has been determined, affected <br /> parties will have ample time to conduct negotiations, make <br /> adjustments, and relocate if necessary. Construction is not <br /> expected to being until about 1990, or later. <br /> (4) State and City staff and the project Citizens Advisory Committee <br /> considered numerous alternative routes, particularly at the <br /> eastern end of the project, before agreeing on Alternatives 1, <br /> 2 and 2A for study in the EIS. We feel that our own re-investi- <br /> gation of the 5th-7th couplet and the 5th Avenue Alternative has <br /> been very useful; our conclusion, however, is that neither of <br /> these is superior to Alternative One, while both of them do <br /> carry some risks of delaying the process. <br /> - <br /> 5 <br />