Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />staff to prepare the public information and to delegate to staff the <br />responsibility for conducting the dissemination of information consistent <br />with State law. The information will be supplemental to the voter's pamphlet <br />issued on the two measures. The City Council will have no involvement in the <br />preparation or dissemination of the information. <br /> <br />Roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously 6:0. <br /> <br />II. WORK SESSION: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION LINE STUDY <br /> <br />Jim Croteau, Planning and Development Department, initiated council.s work <br />session on the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) transmission line by <br />outlining the components of the presentation and noting the high level of <br />public interest in the project. He introduced the BPA project manager, Tom <br />McKinney. <br /> <br />Mr. McKinney provided a brief summary of the events leading up to the release <br />of the BPA draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the transmission <br />line study. The project has been an ongoing joint effort between BPA and <br />local agencies to develop a long-range plan for power line siting in the <br />metro area that can be incorporated into local land use plans. Mr. McKinney <br />explained the manner in which BPA customers are served through a series of <br />transmission loops, and he identified the growing need to reinforce the loop <br />in locations within the metro area to ensure reliability. Four alternatives <br />to accomplish this and other long-term improvements in south Eugene have been <br />proposed by BPA and Mr. McKinney acknowledged that each has inherent <br />disadvantages and opposition. Despite growing public concern, BPA considers <br />the project to be worthwhile and is willing to cooperate with local officials <br />in soliciting public input on the most appropriate alternative. Mr. McKinney <br />stated that BPA would like some assurance that once public consensus has been <br />reached, there will be no further opposition to changing the metro area's <br />land use plans. In response to public concerns and requests from local <br />officials, BPA has agreed to defer its public hearings on February 21 and 28, <br />1990, until the process by which decisions will be made becomes better <br />defined. <br /> <br />Mayor Miller expressed appreciation for BPA's cooperative attitude. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked whether service to the population south of Eugene will be <br />considered when determining projected need. Mr. McKinney responded that, <br />based on growth projections, the area south of Eugene will be a significant <br />factor in determining need, and he noted that distant loads served from the <br />Eugene area require the same degree of reliability as those of local <br />customers. At Mr. Holmer's request, he explained that Alternative A (which <br />uses the existing Alvey-Lane corridor to construct a new 13-mile 500-kV line) <br />is generally considered to be the preferred alternative because it may reduce <br />electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and offers the most aesthetic options. <br />Mayor Miller commented that Alternative A would affect the greatest number of <br />people and could jeopardize some of the amenities of an area that residents <br />have been working hard to preserve. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 14, 1990 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />