My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
11-20-2017
>
11/20/17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2017 2:18:58 PM
Creation date
11/17/2017 2:17:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/20/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
7/15/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene, Oregon (2002 Citizen Charter Review Committee) <br />Population is 167,000 City Budget is $676 million City Manager has executive authority <br />Appointed Auditor has no audit staff and a probable budget of $150,000 <br />The 2002 Eugene Charter Review Committee recommended a charter amendment to establish a <br />City Council -appointed performance auditor. The committee felt that a single auditor would be <br />sufficient, pursuant to a recommendation by then -Portland City Auditor Gary Blackmer. <br />DUTIES OF AUDITOR By charter, the auditor would conduct or contract audits intended to <br />measure or improve city functions following generally accepted government auditing standards. <br />INDEPENDENCE The committee wanted to ensure both independence and accountability. <br />Independence was to be ensured by having the auditor report to the City Council, rather than the <br />City Manager. The auditor would have a work plan based on GAGAS, reviewed and approved by <br />an audit committee. The audit committee composition to be "the city manager and other <br />members as defined by the ordinance" in the charter language. Other language in the <br />recommendation specified that the composition should be the Mayor, 3 City Councilors, 2 City <br />Budget Committee lay members, and the City Manager. <br />ACCESS TO INFORMATION The proposal was somewhat oblique, but specified in its <br />comments (but not the charter language) that one of the duties of the audit committee was to <br />mediate between the audited entities and the auditor. <br />ACCOUNTABILITY The auditor was to be an at -will employee of the Council, which could <br />remove the auditor with or without cause. Candidates would be required hold a certification as a <br />CPA, CIA, CMA, or "relevant certification" throughout their tenure. The auditor will follow <br />Generally Accepted Government Accounting Standards. All reports and audits will be posted <br />publicly. <br />FUNDING The proposal did not specify a particular budget or minimum salary. Taking the <br />County auditor as an exemplar of the costs of operating a small office, a figure of $150,000 is an <br />approximation of the cost. The Council would determine the budget, which might be greater if <br />that year's audit plan included a number of contracted audits. <br />OTHER UNIQUE PROVISIONS The audit committee would review candidates for the auditor <br />position and forward them to the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.