Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e less for Concept B than for Concept A. Mr. Robertson stated that in Concept <br /> B, it might be possible to use the basement space for additional underground <br /> parking. The cost of this, which is not calculated into the total, would be <br /> approximately $1,273,000. <br /> Mr. Robertson noted that from a staffing standpoint, Concept B allows for a <br /> more efficient library operation and is the preferred design of the Library <br /> Board. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Robertson said that both con- <br /> cepts provide elevators for accessibility needs. <br /> Mr. Robertson said that the outside of the building is primarily glazed brick <br /> with colored ceramic tile and a precast concrete base. Mr. Miller pOinted <br /> out the importance of wood products in our community and asked why wood was <br /> not chosen for the exterior of the building. In response, Mr. Robertson said <br /> that brick and ceramic tile were chosen because they are low-maintenance <br /> materials and would rarely need replacing. He noted, however, that wood can <br /> playa major role in the interior library design. <br /> Mr. Boles observed that the main entrance of the proposed library building is <br /> on 10th Avenue, away from the downtown mall. He asked whether consideration <br /> was given to deepening the plaza on the other side. Mr. Robertson said that <br /> the opportunity exists to extend plaza design to the north and create a <br /> larger plaza. <br /> e Responding to a question from Mr. Miller, Mr. Robertson said that no consid- <br /> eration was given to dividing library construction into phases. Although <br /> there might be some additional costs, phased library construction would be a <br /> poss i bil ity. <br /> Mr. Holmer asked what the costs of constructing an equivalent building on <br /> another location might be. In response, Mr. Robertson agreed to provide the <br /> council with these figures. He noted that, although they are not as signifi- <br /> cant as he would like, there are cost savings associated with renovating <br /> rather than destroying the existing building. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Green concerning library parking, Mr. <br /> Robertson said that the architects envision a parking lot renovation to <br /> include planting strips, pedestrian walkways, and increased parking widths. <br /> The cost of parking redevelopment, which is not included in overall cost <br /> figures, would approach $200,000. In light of the current fuel situation, <br /> Mr. Boles expressed concern with increasing the size of parking spaces to <br /> accommodate less fuel-efficient cars. <br /> Ms. Bascom asked whether technological advancements in library operation such <br /> as the replacement of books by compact disks have been considered in library <br /> design needs. Mr. Robertson said that consideration has been given for the <br /> "cutting edge" of library services in the future. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 12, 1990 Page 6 <br />