Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e Mayor Miller thanked Mr. Arkell for the briefing and stated that the <br /> council's public hearing on this matter would be on November 5, 1990. <br /> Mayor Miller adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council and convened <br /> the meeting of the Urban Renewal Agency. <br /> V. WORK SESSION: USE OF URBAN RENEWAL CASH RESERVES <br /> Bob Hibschman, Planning and Development Department, reported on this issue. <br /> At the council's September 10 meeting, staff presented a review of the <br /> downtown projects that could use the limited financial resources of the <br /> renewal district. He noted that there is currently about $5 million in <br /> unallocated cash reserves that could be used for projects authorized by the <br /> Urban Renewal Plan. <br /> Mr. Hibschman indicated that staff was directed to return to the council with <br /> a proposed recommendation on how the reserve money could be allocated to the <br /> projects. He explained that there are at least three primary gUidelines for <br /> resource allocation, including: conformance to and furtherance of adopted <br /> policy, the availability of other funding resources, and the extent of public <br /> funds to leverage private investment. Staff recommended that $1 million be <br /> set aside for the library project while the remaining amount of $4 million be <br /> used for other projects. <br /> Mr. Hibschman briefly summarized the proposed projects. He warned that if <br /> e Ballot Measure 5 passes, the impact could reduce the amount of Urban Renewal <br /> Cash Reserves available to the projects to $3 million. He emphasized that <br /> all of the projects being considered for the remaining reserves address the <br /> goals and objectives of the voter-approved Urban Renewal Plan update. <br /> Noting that the Lane Transit District (LTD) transfer station is currently <br /> located within the downtown urban renewal boundary, Ms. Ehrman asked whether <br /> some of the cash reserves could be used to help with the transfer station <br /> relocation. Mr. Hibschman said that he did not think that this would be <br /> legal, but that he would check with the City Attorney's Office. <br /> Mr. Boles said that a portion of the Retail Task Force's design recommenda- <br /> tions for the downtown mall consider the possible uses of the Equitable <br /> building which is owned by the Resolution Trust Corporation. Because this <br /> property is currently vacant, he suggested that the City attempt to acquire <br /> it for future use in the central plaza redesign. <br /> Ms. Bascom asked about the potential cost of property acquisition. Mr. <br /> Gleason said that it is difficult to predict how much this would cost; <br /> depending on the nature of the asbestos problem, he estimated a cost of <br /> $.5 million. <br /> Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to direct the City <br /> Manager to take the necessary actions to acquire the property <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 17, 1990 Page 8 <br />