My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/14/1991 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1991
>
01/14/1991 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:24:17 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/14/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />required sewering of residents in River Road/Santa Clara, and said that some <br />attempts toward cooperation should be made between the two parties rather <br />than trying to force residents to comply with mandatory sewer hook-ups. <br /> <br />Vora Heintz, 1038 Jayne Drive, indicated that this fee, which has been pro- <br />posed for several years, is illegal and unfair because it provides neither <br />services nor benefits to residents in the River Road/Santa Clara area. <br /> <br />There being no additional requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />In response to questions raised during public testimony, Mr. Smith said that <br />there will be no retroactive charge to individuals who have already connected <br />to sewers. He explained that the equalization fee is classified as an SDC; <br />the City of Eugene is allowed to collect the sanitary sewer portion of the <br />the SDC as a result of ORS Section 223. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith indicated that all property owners connecting to sewers will be <br />required to pay this fee. Reiterating a point made earlier, he said that <br />some credits may be given, depending upon the length of time a parcel of <br />property has been in the Lane County service district. <br /> <br />In response to questions regarding the bond election, Mr. Smith said that the <br />decision to exclude the River Road/Santa Clara residents from that bond elec- <br />tion was made by the Lane County Board of Commissioners. <br /> <br />Regarding the issue raised by Mr. Halsey regarding the impact of this charge <br />on the ability to construct affordable housing, Mr. Smith pointed out the <br />Eugene Code currently provides and will continue to provide exemptions from <br />SDCs for low-income housing. <br /> <br />Responding to questions from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Smith estimated that approxi- <br />mately seven percent of the individuals who have connected to sewers will not <br />be required to pay the equalization fee. He also explained that while the <br />main portion of the sewer treatment plant became operational in 1985, the <br />sludge disposal facility has not yet received performance certification. The <br />life expectancy of the entire facility is approximately 50 years. <br /> <br />CB 4277--An ordinance concerning development charges; amending <br />Sections 7.275, 7.277, 7.279, 7.281, 7.283, and 7.285 <br />of the Eugene Code, 1971. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, that the bill, with <br />unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by <br />council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at <br />this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, <br />7:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to reconsider the <br />motion. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 14, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.