04/29/1991 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e indicated that the species which live along the shoreline of a river are impacted less by boating activity because it often affords better refuge. Peter Davis, 1445 Linda Avenue, identified himself as a former employee of Blue Water Boats and voiced his opposition to the proposal. He recognized the need that exists to expand the Blue Water Boats manufacturing facility, but voiced concern with the impact of this facility on the existing wildlife. He testified that while he was employed at the facility, he witnessed the improper handling of hazardous materials by employees, in particular the overspilling of acetone into the surrounding gravel. He noted that he has recently viewed the site and said that infractions still exist. He said that Mr. Defoe may not be aware of improper chemical handling that takes place on the site. Mr. Davis said that he is aware of drug activity among employees during work and said that this might make the facility more susceptible to accidents. He encouraged the jurisdictions to explore more fully the harmful environmental impacts on the site before plan approval. Responding to a question from Mr. Walters, Mr. Davis estimated that approxi- mately two or three gallons of acetone were spilled on the site at a time. Responding to a question from Mr. Roberts, Mr. Davis said that he has wit- nessed several incidents of illegal drug activity taking place on the job during his employment at Blue Water Boats. Although the facility has imple- mented drug testing for new employees, testing is not required for existing employees. e Neutral Testimony Bill Castillo, 3150 East Main Street, District Wildlife Biologist with ODWF, testified on this issue. He testified that the site is heavily used by wild- life and that the impacts of boat activity on the surrounding wildlife can not be completely mitigated. He pointed out that this is a compromise pro- posal that attempts to minimize the loss of habitat. Mr. MacDonald asked Mr. Castillo whether he would recommend against use of this property for boat testing. In response, Mr. Castillo said that in de- veloping the mitigation strategy, he attempted to achieve a balance between the industry and the wildlife. It is not possible to achieve a balance that would mitigate impacts entirely. Mr. MacDonald asked whether it might be possible to further mitigate the impacts of wave action on wildlife by adding more log booms on the pond. Mr. Castillo responded that this would be a possibility, but has not been discussed. In response to a question from Mr. Wojcik, Mr. Castillo indicated that the pond is 20 acres; 1300 feet, by 600 feet. The composition of the land is sand and gravel. Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Castillo said that he did not address the impacts of toxic chemicals on the surrounding wildlife. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 29, 1991 Springfield City Council Lane County Board of Commissioners Page 11