Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />greater impact to vegetation than to wildlife in the area. He explained that <br />the extent of the impact on wildlife is heavily influenced by the frequency <br />of testing. Wildlife does not adapt well to boat usage activity. <br /> <br />Responding to a question, Mr. Castillo said that he does not have documented <br />evidence on the impact of boating activity on wildlife but is certain that <br />such research exists. <br /> <br />Mr. Walters asked whether a species would be lost entirely under the proposed <br />mitigation strategy. In response, Mr. Castillo said that species existence <br />depends on a variety of factors. Species composition declines whenever de- <br />velopment occurs; the most sensitive species would likely be displaced from <br />the area. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. MacDonald, Mr. Oberst said that he was <br />contacted by the National Fish and Wildlife Service who noted that this area <br />was on the national wetlands inventory and inquired about the site develop- <br />ment proposal. In response to questions about the northwestern pond turtle, <br />they indicated that they are not officially concerned with animals that are <br />not on the Endangered Species list. <br /> <br />Mr. Oberst said that this is a proposal for an urban growth boundary amend- <br />ment and briefly reviewed the criteria on which the decision should be based. <br />He noted that at the time of the initial staff presentation to the Spring- <br />field Planning Commission, there was no wildlife inventory of this site on <br />any of the eXisting Metro Plan wildlife inventories. The land was previously <br />zoned for sand and gravel use and has a current, up-to-date sand and gravel <br />permit. <br /> <br />Mr. Oberst said that this plan is a compromise proposal for which the juris- <br />dictions will need to determine whether industry and wildlife can co-exist. <br />He noted that if the plan is approved, the site would be new industry and <br />would be subject to additional State and Federal regulations. With respect <br />to spillage, Blue Water Boats has not recorded violations. <br /> <br />Responding to questions from Mayor Morrisette, Division Chief Dennis Murphy, <br />Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety, clarified some issues raised <br />during public testimony. He noted that Springfield has a hazardous materials <br />first response operational system complementary to Eugene's regional response <br />team. Authorization can be instantaneous by calling Salem. He noted that <br />Blue Water Boats has undergone random, hazardous material inspections on a <br />biannual basis and described them as a cooperative partner in fire and haz- <br />ardous materials safe occupancy. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Green, Mr. Murphy said that the department <br />was not aware of an impact of acetone spillage of this quantity. <br /> <br />Mr. Rust moved, seconded by Ms. Dumdi, to postpone the hearing <br />on Good Neighbors Care Center, Inc., until May 6, 1991. The <br />motion carried. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 29, 1991 <br />Springfield City Council <br />Lane County Board of Commissioners <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />