My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/13/1991 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1991
>
05/13/1991 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:12:55 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:58:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/13/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Nicholson said "ghetto" when referring to a middle-class neighborhood, <br />meant a homogeneous concentration of people. He said the council seemed <br />primarily concerned about housing becoming substandard. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said most of east Springfield is zoned industrial. She said the <br />property in question is one portion of a much larger industrial area. Ms. <br />Childs said this area is covered by the Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan which <br />attempts to address issues of residential and industrial coexistence. She <br />said the plan identifies this land as remaining industrial. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Childs said the metro area has <br />nearly reached equilibrium on medium-density residential housing in the metro <br />area, although there is no excess land for this purpose. She said the Metro <br />Plan has not identified where more medium-density hOUSing could be placed. <br />She said that in terms of inventory, the area could probably use more medi- <br />um-density development. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles said one of the issues the council should raise for consideration <br />by the MPC was whether this property could be effectively buffered for use as <br />a housing development for low-income and elderly persons. He noted that <br />contiguous property is residential. Ms. Bascom said the housing in this area <br />included some of the lowest-income residences in Lane County that she had <br />ever seen. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman noted that the lane County Commissioners are concerned about the <br />schools in this area because they are already full. Ms. Bascom added that <br />the Springfield City Council is very divided on this issue and probably open <br />to negotiations. Mr. MacDonald said one point to negotiate might be the need <br />to attract supermarkets to the area. Mr. Green said this kind of commercial <br />development would probably occur naturally after a housing development was <br />built. <br /> <br />Mayor Miller noted that he felt a wider buffer from east to west was needed <br />in this project. In response to a comment by Ms. Bascom, Ms. Childs said the <br />original proposal made by Good Neighbor Care Centers included more housing <br />units and was reduced, based on the need to provide more buffering. She <br />noted that specific comments about the plan designation would be helpful to <br />the MPC. Mayor Miller said the council could state that it wanted the plan <br />configuration changed in certain ways. <br /> <br />In response to a comment by Ms. Bascom, Ms. Childs said the council could not <br />ask for specific kinds of development, such as owner-occupied cooperative <br />housing for low-income people, because this was not part of the plan amend- <br />ment process. She said the owner could be asked to enter into a covenant to <br />this effect. <br /> <br />Ms. Childs pointed out that even it the council voted to approve the Metro <br />Plan amendment, the current ordinance findings would probably need to be <br />expanded. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 13, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.