07/08/1991 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-- ---- e annual basis in the newspaper. He agreed to provide the council with a list of the industry's most recently cited violators. Mr. Boles asked whether the proposed ordinance reinforces the movement toward point-source control mechanisms for discharge. Mr. Ollerenshaw said that the ordinance does not address point-source discharges. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Ollerenshaw said that in his opinion, the standards that are set in the ordinance would be adequate to protect the health and safety of the community. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 6:0. (Ordi- nance No. 19791). II. CONSENT CALENDAR (Contd.) A. Approval of City Council Minutes of April 24, 1991, Lunch Work Session; April 29, 1991, Joint Meeting; and May 8, 1991, Lunch Work Session Ms. Bascom asked that page 2 of the council minutes of April 24, 1991, be amended to indicated that there are "15" rather than "50" new units of hous- ing at Laurel Grove. She also said that "the first stage of landscape de- sign" has been initiated on the Walnut Grove site. e Referring to the council minutes of April 29, 1991, page 14, Mr. Nicholson said that at his request, he was provided with a verbatim transcript of the minutes. He said he does not feel that the summary of the testimony between Mr. Defoe and Mr. Rust is adequately captured in the minutes and asked that paragraph 4, sentence 2 of that page be amended to read "In response, Mr. Defoe said that this piece of land was chosen because of its affordable price and isolation." Mr. Boles suggested that the full council be given an opportunity to review the verbatim transcript and make a decision at another meeting. He said that if the council is not satisfied with Mr. Nicholson's wording, then the coun- cil might consider placing the verbatim text in this portion of the minutes. Mayor Miller stated his concern with placing a verbatim transcript in the text, noting that a portion of the discussion may be misconstrued if taken out of context of the full discussion. Responding to a question from Mr. MacDonald, Mr. Gary said that if the case were appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) and a party requested a verbatim copy of the entire minutes, it would have to be provided and would be considered legally admissible in that hearing. The council agreed to withhold approval of the April 24, 1991, council min- utes until the full council has had an opportunity to review the verbatim transcri pt. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 8, 1991 Page 9