Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e -upgrades the physical character/built environment; <br /> -addresses the site location and surroundings; <br /> -establishes a continuous developed edge/street wall, sense of enclo- <br /> sure; <br /> -creates a sense of visual continuity and tradition; <br /> -reinforces a sense of human scale, creates a rich pedestrian experi- <br /> ence at the street level; and <br /> -is accessible to persons with disabilities. <br /> Ms. Bohman explained that the guidelines highlight specific design elements <br /> to be addressed in discussions between the developer and the City. All <br /> guidelines will be open to discussion, with flexibility varying according to <br /> the emphasis described. Ms. Bohman referred to projects which have been <br /> proposed in the past to provide examples of the guidelines. The guidelines <br /> deal with the following major areas: <br /> 1. Pedestrian Orientation <br /> 2. Building/Sidewalk/Street Relationship <br /> 3. Visual Relatedness <br /> 4. Open Spaces <br /> 5. Use of the Public Right-of-Way (ROW) <br /> 6. Vehicular Access, Service, and Parking <br /> Mayor Miller voiced concern that the uniformity that the design guidelines <br /> promotes could lead to sterile developments. The City should use caution in <br />- enforcing the guidelines so as not to hinder a developer's creativity. Mr. <br /> Gleason responded that if a designer wants to do something contrary to recom- <br /> mended development patterns, he or she must demonstrate why it should be <br /> acceptable. <br /> Mr. Boles said that the pattern language currently used by the University of <br /> Oregon would provide a useful approach to this issue. He suggested that the <br /> City work with a University representative who is familiar with the pattern <br /> approach to urban design who would review the guidelines and tell how they <br /> relate to existing patterns. Mr. Boles emphasized that patterns should be <br /> flexible and allow creativity in the development. Mr. MacDonald supported <br /> this suggestion. <br /> (Councilor Rutan left at this time.) <br /> Ms. Ehrman said that the architectural group for the Schaeffer's Building <br /> developed a number of patterns which could be included in this effort. <br /> Ms. Bohman said that the guidelines did go through a public review process in <br /> which the City sought input from developers and architects. While turnout <br /> was poor, most of the input about the guidelines was positive. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said that encouraging the use of alternate modes of transportation <br /> should be included in Guideline 6, Vehicle Access, Service, and Parking. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 31, 1991 Page 7 <br />