Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e the property has a higher value than the assessed market value. Mr. Boggs <br /> said the funds for purchasing the property would come from Airport Reserve <br /> funds and would be reimbursed with Federal funding at a later date. <br /> Referring to concern expressed earlier, Mr. MacDonald said this was a case <br /> which illustrated the City's willingness to work with property owners. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Boggs said staff believes <br /> that the difference between what the owner wants for the property and the <br /> current market value is so significant that it would not likely be resolved <br /> in negotiations. Despite this, the property owner has expressed interest to <br /> pursue negotiations for the sale of his property. <br /> City Attorney Bill Gary explained that if the council approved the ordinance, <br /> the City could purchase the property, irrespective of the will of the proper- <br /> ty owner. The proceedings provide a mechanism whereby a disagreement about <br /> price could be resolved through obtaining appraisals and, ultimately, if <br /> necessary, by a court proceeding whereby a jury would determine the fair <br /> market value. If the City and the property owner ultimately come to an <br /> agreement, then each side would bear the cost of their own appraisals. If <br /> the matter goes to court, the City would be required to make an offer in <br /> writing prior to a jury's decision. If the jury's verdict exceeds the City's <br /> last offer in writing made 30 days before trial, the City would be required <br /> to pay for the property owner's costs of attorney fees and appraisals; if the <br /> City's offer is lower than the jury's verdict, the property owner would bear <br /> his costs. <br />e Mr. Boles did not support approving land acquisition for a project that had <br /> no funding for it. <br /> Mr. Boggs said the parallel runway was needed to handle airport operations <br /> capacity. <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> Council Bill 4341 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, that the bill be ap- <br /> proved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion <br /> passed 5:2, with councilors councilors Green, Rutan, <br /> Robinette, Bascom, and MacDonald voting in favor and council- <br /> ors Nicholson and Boles voting against, and became Ordinance <br /> 19809. <br /> City Attorney Bill Gary said that, based on the council's vote, the emergency <br /> clause would not take effect and the ordinance would not be effective until <br /> 30 days after the Mayor's signature. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 4, 1991 Page 11 <br />