01/29/1992 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e ~ not productive. However, he said that Dan Desler presented the proposals to various developers in the area who have indicated an interest in proceeding with some of the development. He emphasized that the residents do not wish to have multiple streets in the area, especially in the medium-density resi- dential area. In response to a question from Mr. Rust, Mr. Bowerman said that the plans that the neighborhood group presented showed open space areas in locations so as not to diminish the opportunity for development. He said that the devel- opment density was similar to the staff's plan, but was organized in such a way to preserve open space. O. W. Marsh, 50 Hayden Bridge Way, said that he purchased his home in Septem- ber 1991, and knew about the proposed extension of Pioneer Parkway at the time he purchased the home. He said that he was given the impression that the parkway would be developed in 10 to 20 years, and that it was uncertain whether additional lands would be needed for the extension. He said that the proposed right-of-way will destroy his septic tank and garden, and would be very close to his house. He maintained that the extension is not needed because most people now shop at malls, which can be accessed via 1-5. He was also opposed to improving Game Farm Road. Arthur Farley, 907 Woodhill Drive, representing the Lane County Audubon So- ciety, stated that the habitat and quality of life for wildlife must be main- tained, and noted that it directly affects the quality of human life. He noted that a survey conducted by the State asked citizens what they liked most about living in Oregon. The majority of responses indicated that the quality of the wildlife and natural areas were important to Oregonians, not the quality of highways. He added that natural areas greatly improve the value of land. He pointed out that the refinement plan contains no protec- tion of open spaces along the McKenzie River. He said that many cities would realize the value of such a natural asset and not allow development within 100 miles of it. He said that the attitude of the plan now is that "growth is good and quality of life is not important". Ms. Smith read a letter submitted by Lynda Raybould, stating the position of the Springfield Planning Commission, which was entered into the record. In addition, written testimony from Bettie and Walter Haxby, 3382 Game Farm Road; Emerick and Gladis Hultin, 2924 Game Farm Road; and Erven Schnetsky, 3492 Baldy View Lane; and the minutes of the tour taken by the Springfield City Council on January 27, 1992. F. Closing of Public Testimony Portion of Public Hearing Mayor Morrisette cl~sed the public testimony portion of the public hearing. G. Recess There was a brief recess at 9:25. MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials January 29, 1992 Page 12