Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Several councilors expressed a desire to add library services to service <br />level 4. In response to a question from Mr. Robinette, Mr. Gleason said that <br />theoretically, business licensing impacts public safety. The council agreed <br />unanimously to add library services to level 4 and move business licensing to <br />levelS. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mayor Miller, the council unanimously agreed <br />that Bookmobile services should remain in service level 5. Mayor Miller <br />wondered whether Hult Center services should be moved to level 4, since it <br />generates income for the community. The council decided that Hult Center <br />services should remain in level 5 (Mayor Miller, Mr. Nicholson, and Mr. Green <br />disagreed). <br /> <br />Regarding land use permits, Mr. MacDonald wondered what the implications <br />would be if the General Fund did not recover the costs of land use permits. <br />Mr. Gleason said that based on citizen input there is a community desire to <br />see services done in a different way. He said that some services included in <br />levelS could be done differently, rather than eliminated. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman expressed a desire to move senior center services to level 4. Ms. <br />Bascom agreed and stated that this service is comparable to specialized <br />recreation services. Mr. Nicholson said that in general people who use spe- <br />cialized recreation are also economically disadvantaged. Ms. Bascom said <br />that if senior center services remain in levelS, senior citizens may per- <br />ceive that the City is removing all the services it provides for them. Ms. <br />Ehrman pointed out that those who use specialized recreation may not be eco- <br />nomically disadvantaged, just as the seniors may not be economically advan- <br />taged. Mr. Mounts said that services such as specialized recreation and <br />senior centers provide more intensive services to a certain segment of the <br />population. This may warrant a different pricing structure than other ser- <br />vices which serve a wider range of the population. Mr. MacDonald said that <br />there are solid management techniques which separate services in levels 1,2, <br />and 3. However, levels 4 and 5 are more difficult to separate. He cautioned <br />that the council may be trying to respond to a community input process which <br />is not complete. Mr. Boles emphasized the importance of social responsibili- <br />ty and making sure facilities are available to everyone in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason suggested that the council craft language regarding its criteria <br />for level 4 services. Staff could then adjust the list of services accord- <br />ingly and provide that information to the council. The council preferred to <br />decide what services should be in the various levels and retain the existing <br />descriptive language. <br /> <br />The council decided that senior center services should remain in levelS. <br />Ms. Ehrman and Mr. Green opposed this decision. <br /> <br />Mr. Nicholson suggested that the word "development" be replaced by "revital- <br />ization" in the description of Service Level 4 services. The council agreed. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />April 6, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />