Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />However, she said that the ratio concept on page 30 is confusing. She said <br />it did not clearly state why mitigating in advance of any impacts would re- <br />duce the need for replacement wetlands--unless it is assumed that the success <br />of the replacement will be known in a short period of time. She said that <br />that assumption can be questioned. <br /> <br />Ms. Jones questioned the reliability of the proposed comprehensive monitoring <br />and maintenance program. She said that the proposed plan recommends a 10- <br />year monitoring program and a 20-year research program. However, a standard <br />regulatory monitoring period is only 5 years. The League recommends at least <br />20 years, since it takes at least that long to restore a wetland and longer <br />to create anything resembling a natural wetland ecosystem. <br /> <br />She expressed support for bonding and other financial guarantees, but thought <br />that some of the funding proposals on page 43-46 may not be realistic consid- <br />ering the current economic climate. <br /> <br />Stephen Lawn, 1510 Jason lee, Cottage Grove, supported the WEWSAS. Regarding <br />water quality issues, he said the the upper portion of the Amazon should be <br />given higher priority in the plan since water quality in this portion of the <br />drainage will effect the west Eugene wetlands study area. He said that the <br />ability of wetlands to remove pollutants from the surface water has been well <br />documented. However, this allows accumulation of toxics in the same area <br />where it once enhanced habitat and attracted wildlife. He said that the <br />poisoning of wetlands in California, Florida, the Great Plains by allowing <br />toxics to enter the system and accumulate has also been well documented. He <br />said that before the City utilizes resources developed for west Eugene's <br />wetlands, efforts to eliminate nonpoint source contamination from entering <br />the wetlands area through the Amazon channel should be top priority in the <br />plan. He said that foresight in this matter may prevent larger problems in <br />the future. <br /> <br />Brian Bales, 88604 Oak Hill Cemetery Road, said that he owns two parcels of <br />land adjacent to the primary acquisition area. He expressed concern that <br />regulations similar to those placed on acquisition areas will be placed on <br />adjacent property. He requested information on the ramifications of farming <br />and conducting similar practices on adjacent land. <br /> <br />Mr. Bales said that the wetlands in the west Eugene area already exist. He <br />said that it seems least expensive to leave the property as it is. He <br />thought that there was little need for the plan. <br /> <br />Debbie Oleson, 28030 Crow Road, said that she lives on the fringe of the <br />study area. She expressed concern about the future effects on her property. <br />She requested that the decision on the study be postponed until everyone <br />effected is adequately notified. <br /> <br />Scott Bales, 28282 Royal Avenue, said that in 1974 he inherited 40 acres of <br />land on Royal Avenue. He said that three years later, regulations limited <br />him to having only one home on the property. He said that he had to imple- <br />ment farming and forestry practices to offset the costs of maintaining the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials <br /> <br />Apri 1 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />