Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />disincentives for developments locating downtown, the core will become the <br />city's employment center. <br /> <br />She said that the Planning Commission realizes that more work is needed to <br />bring the policies to code certainty. She said that the commission has pro- <br />vided a list of implementation priorities, found in the front of the study. <br /> <br />Dick Williams, 3830 Donald Street, representing the local chapter of the <br />American Institute of Architects (AlA), stated that AlA formed a committee <br />addressing commercial design issues of which he chaired. He said that the <br />committee focused on the quality of commercial design. <br /> <br />In reference to Part III of the study, on page 31, he said that the committee <br />examined current design quality standards and found several shortcomings in <br />the City's eXisting regulations. He said that there are minimal setback <br />requirements with 100 percent lot coverage allowed for bUilding and parking <br />in all but the general office zone, no land ;s set aside for green space, <br />parking lot size ;s unlimited, and no buffering is required if abutting a <br />commercial zone. He maintained that the goal of the current Eugene Code <br />standards is to allow developers to develop at minimal costs. He said that <br />this becomes a long-term liability to the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams said that the AlA committee focused on site development and <br />parking issues and quality of commercial buildings. The AlA recommended <br />prescriptive standards for site development and parking. This approach is <br />modelled after Corvallis, Oregon's current approach. Regarding building <br />design, AlA recommends a design review process. The committee's report in- <br />cluded a list of goals and issues that designers would be required to meet. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams expressed appreciation that the final draft included many of the <br />AlA committee's recommendations. He said that the only significant exception <br />was that the Planning Commission recommended that prescriptive standards be <br />optional for design review for building design. He said that the AlA opposes <br />this recommendation. He emphasized that the design guidelines proposed by <br />AlA would not pose a serious economic or administrative burden on developers <br />or City administrators. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams said that AlA recommends adoption of the study and offers to <br />continue cooperating with the City in developing implementing ordinances. <br /> <br />Bill Seider, 1660 Washington Street, President of the Southwest Oregon Chap- <br />ter of the AlA, stated that the chapter supports the draft Commercial lands <br />Study. He read a letter stating that in January 1990, AlA was approached by <br />the Eugene Planning Department to assist in the design review of large-scale <br />commercial facilities recently constructed. A committee of six architects <br />and one landscape architect met several times to address the poor site and <br />building designs and unlandscaped parking lots observed on the existing de- <br />velopments. The committee delivered a set of recommendations focused on site <br />and parking lot design based on a prescriptive set of guidelines. The com- <br />mittee felt that building design should not be limited by prescriptive codes, <br />but should be subject to other design review strategies. He expressed appre- <br /> <br />MINUTfS--Joint Elected Officials <br /> <br />Apri 1 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />