Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Charles Biggs, 2405 Willakenzie Road, introduced himself as a former archi- <br />tectural student at the U of 0 and offered a design he drafted for considera- <br />tion. He described his design as a convertible two-way street with IO-foot, <br />6-inch wide lanes. He said a smaller lane width would increase pedestrian <br />safety and that the street would retain the existing fountain as well as <br />multiple-uses for special events. <br /> <br />Jim Torrey, 2545 Chuckanut Street, representing the Chamber of Commerce and <br />the Community Coalition for Downtown, described the formation of the Communi- <br />ty Coalition for Downtown, which is composed of both proponents and opponents <br />of the Willamette Street proposal and supports the Olive Street proposal. <br /> <br />Jonathan Stafford, 434 East 11th Avenue, Downtown Commission member, said he <br />believed that given the time constraints the commission was working under, <br />the design was better than expected, although he said it was not the design <br />he preferred. He urged for the consideration of including smaller water <br />features should funds become available. <br /> <br />Tom Slocum, 1950 Graham Drive, testified in support of the proposal. He <br />suggested removing the turn lanes from the design to allow more parking spac- <br />es to be installed. <br /> <br />There being no other requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Councilors requested that further information on the following be provided at <br />the April 15 work session: 1) the relationship between pedestrians, automo- <br />biles, persons with visual impairment, and wheelchair accessibility at the <br />intersection of Olive Street and Broadway; 2) the placement of curb cuts; and <br />3) further information on the turn lanes and traffic requirements. <br /> <br />(The council took a break.) <br /> <br />v. PUBLIC HEARING: DRAFT URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Bob Hammitt, Public Works, <br />presented the staff report. Tonight's public hearing on the draft Urban <br />Forest Management Plan (UFMP) follows nearly two years of work by the Tree <br />Commission and an intense citizen involvement process. Public hearings on <br />the UFMP have been held by the Tree Commission and the Planning Commission. <br />Among the plan's 19 policies, public comment has focused mostly on policies <br />12 and 17, which include mandatory and voluntary alternatives for preserva- <br />tion of heritage and other trees on private property. The Tree Commission <br />and Planning Commission developed separate versions of both policies. The <br />Tree Commission's version of Policy 12 would require tree protection; the <br />Planning Commission's would encourage tree protection. The Tree Commission's <br />version of Policy 17, which governs heritage trees, requires a mandatory <br />approach to preserving heritage trees; the Planning Commission's version <br />takes a voluntary approach. The Council Committee on Infrastructure (CCI) <br />further developed separate policies of 12 and 17, which are outlined in the <br />March 11, 1992, memorandum included in the council packets. After the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />7:30 <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />