My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/1992 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
04/22/1992 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:03:24 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Green indicated his opposition to a restaurant tax due to the burden it <br />would place on business. He reiterated his interest in a retail sales tax. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles pointed out that the tax was not a tax on restaurants, but rather a <br />tax on those who ate in restaurants. He likened the arguments made by Mr. <br />Green and Mr. Rutan to those made 15 years previously in relationship to the <br />room tax from the hospitality industry. He supported Mr. Nicholson's desire <br />to widen the base of the tax. <br /> <br />The council took a straw poll on the proposal in support of a five-percent <br />restaurant tax, which failed to gain the support of five councilors. <br /> <br />Mr. Green proposed a 1/2-of-one-percent retail sales tax to support the <br />library. He said that the tax would exclude food, medicine, rent, and <br />utilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Nicholson suggested that the yield from the tax would not justify the <br />high externalized administrative costs for business. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan believed that a retail sales tax was sensible, broad-based, and <br />would yield sufficient revenue to support the library, while questioning the <br />appeal of the tax to the electorate. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman said that Eugene would be the only community in Oregon with a <br />retail sales tax, which she believed would put the community at an economic <br />disadvantage. Mr. Boles added that the tax was not discretionary and would <br />disproportionately affect low-income residents. Noting that he had moved to <br />Eugene from a state with a sales tax that had originally been one percent and <br />had moved to 4-3/4 percent without voter approval, Mr. Boles considered a <br />sales tax dangerous as it raised revenues without accountability. Mr. <br />Nicholson indicated his agreement with Mr. Boles' remarks. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller suggested that a sales tax could be capped through the charter. <br />He said that in informal polling of audiences he addressed, about 80 percent <br />of the audience indicated support for a sales tax. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said she preferred to present the community with a range of <br />options to fund the library. She did not support a retail sales tax unique <br />to Eugene. Professor Ed Weeks indicated that the next survey would test the <br />community's reactions to the range of suggested revenues as well as the <br />specific strategies. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinette said that although he could support a retail sales tax in <br />conjunction with Springfield and lane County, he could not support a sales <br />tax unique to Eugene as he believed it would drive consumers outside the city <br />limits. <br /> <br />Mr. Green's proposal for a retail sales tax failed to gain adequate support <br />for inclusion in Strategy Package B. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />April 22, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.