My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/20/1992 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
05/20/1992 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:14:57 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:05:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/20/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />"--" <br /> <br />recommendations, he said, make it clear that sales have to be willingly <br />negotiated at fair market value. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to adopt the <br />amendments to the West Eugene Wetlands Plan recommended by <br />staff (assuming the council prefers Option 3). The motion <br />passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />CB 4365--An ordinance adopting the West Eugene Wetlands <br />Special Area Study Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with <br />unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by <br />council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at <br />this time. Roll call vote. The motion passed unanimously, <br />8:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill be <br />approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. The motion <br />passed unanimously, 8:0 and became Ordinance 19853. <br /> <br />Mr. Nicholson said the report does not address the issue that the City ought <br />to be preserving the wetlands that are within the urban boundary. Some see <br />the City's action as promoting industrial use of urban wetland, while going <br />outside the boundary to buy property to create wetlands to compensate. <br /> <br />Mr. Gordon said that in the process of identifying wetland within the <br />metropolitan plan boundary, staff attempted to gather the best information <br />about the relative value of those wetlands. Staff not only considered how <br />that land looks today, but how urban development would affect it over time <br />and what the public's investment in that land is. The wetlands recommended <br />for development a) have low wetland value, b) were located in places where <br />preservation was impossible, and c) prOVide an opportunity to recoup the <br />public investment. <br /> <br />Neil Bjorklund, Planning and Development Department, made the point that <br />staff has not inventoried wetlands in "the secondary study area." Those <br />sites identified for mitigation may currently be wetlands or may historically <br />have been wetlands. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles asked for staff's perspective on where the City went awry with <br />respect to public involvement. Mr. Gordon said such an evaluation will be <br />conducted after the plan is adopted, and recommendations will be forwarded to <br />the council. <br /> <br />IV. WORK SESSION: COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Ms. Norris recalled that during the Eugene Decisions process, the council has <br />received feedback related to City salaries and benefits. This item continues <br /> <br />'"-,,, <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />11 :30 a.m. <br /> <br />May 20, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.