Laserfiche WebLink
<br />patterns were not considered a problem, as was the loss of the medium- and <br />high-density land. <br /> <br />Ken Tollenaar, of the Planning Commission, stated that the minimum density <br />assumptions are not probable densities. He emphasized that the Planning <br />Commission recommended minimum density standards for medium- and high-density <br />development citywide. He said that when that issue is presented to the City <br />Council, the issue of establishing a minimum density standard for low-density <br />development could be discussed. He said that the Planning Commission did not <br />discuss such a standard, although he supported the concept. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Lowe said that low-density <br />development in the Willakenzie area currently occurs at three to five units <br />per acre. In reference to the last paragraph discussing residential densities <br />on page four of the staff notes, Mr. Boles wondered why minimum density re- <br />quirements have not been imposed already, if they are suggested in the Metro <br />Plan. Mr. Lowe stated that there are several proposed actions in the Metro <br />Plan which have not been imposed. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Robinette, Mr. Lowe said that the proposed <br />development on Country Club Road would not significantly affect the figures in <br />the staff notes. In response to a question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Lowe said <br />that the disagreement between the Planning Commission and the Planning Team <br />was not about specific lots, but rather, about whether the Planning Team had <br />met the Metro Plan requirements. The magnitude of the disagreement was 300 <br />dwelling units. He added that the Planning Team and the Planning Commission <br />~ also disagreed conceptually on the issue of the character of the area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />B. North Delta Highway <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe indicated on the displayed map the location of the proposed side- <br />walks. He said that testimony was heard from an owner of adjacent property <br />outside the urban growth boundary (UGB) who stated that sidewalks are not <br />needed in that area. The Planning Team maintained that sidewalks are not <br />needed on the west side of Delta Highway, and proposed that sidewalks be added <br />only on the east side. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe said that currently, TransPlan includes a project to improve the <br />segment of North Delta Highway with bicycle paths and sidewalks on both sides <br />of the street. That project is based on the belief that, in the future, <br />traffic on the highway will increase, the surrounding undeveloped land will be <br />residentially developed, and transit needs on the highway will increase. He <br />said that providing sidewalks on both sides of the street will allow Lane <br />Transit District (LTD) to provide north- and southbound service. The Planning <br />Team also expressed concern about safety, because that segment of the highway <br />is frequently used by gravel trucKs. <br /> <br />Mr. MacDonald clarified that the Metro Plan does not anticipate growth beyond <br />the UGB. In response to a question from Mr. MacDonald, Mr. Lowe said that the <br />area inside the UGB, near North Delta Highway, is designated Light Medium <br /> <br />MINUTfS--fugene City Council <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />June 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />