Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> taining the status quo until it is possible to distinguish policy effective- <br /> e ness from program efficiency. The council should address policy effective- <br /> ness, he said, and leave program efficiency within the Manager's purview. <br /> Mr. Gleason argued for maintaining a market-based compensation policy due to <br /> its value in collective bargaining. <br /> The council discussed the criteria to be used by the City in selecting public <br /> and private sector agencies to survey. Mr. Gleason explained that the size of <br /> the recruitment area depends on the position being recruited; for example, to <br /> recruit black police officers, the City must look outside the local area. Ms. <br /> Norris explained that the geographical area of recruitment is expanded for two <br /> reasons: to achieve a sufficiently large pool of qualified applicants, and to <br /> achieve sufficient diversity in that pool. She said that criteria can include <br /> social issues; for example, the City currently lacks enough Spanish-speaking <br /> police officers. <br /> Mr. Gleason stated that the Federal government requires the City to be able to <br /> demonstrate that its work force reflects the ethnic composition of the commu- <br /> nity. In effect, the City must seek a balance in order to avoid vulnerability <br /> to lawsuits from either minorities or whites claiming bias in City employment <br /> policies. <br /> Mr. Green stated that City leaders appeared to favor a policy on diversity in <br /> hiring that sought only the minimum necessary compliance with the law. Mr. <br /> Gleason responded that the numbers of minorities in the City's work force <br /> e already exceed Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) standards in many <br /> job categories; in others, the City is aggressively recruiting minorities in <br /> the belief that the community's composition will become more racially and <br /> ethnically diverse in the future. In response to Mr. Boles' suggestion that <br /> the City's objectives be reflected in the written criteria, he stated that in <br /> order to avoid lawsuit, the City's policy must not dictate favoring or exclud- <br /> ing any group. <br /> Ms. Norris suggested rewriting the criterion to state that the geographical <br /> area used by the City in selecting public and private sector agencies to sur- <br /> vey should assist the City in meeting its affirmative action goals. Mr. Boles <br /> suggested adding that the area should contain applicants who will provide <br /> optimum service for the City's changing, diverse population. The council <br /> agreed with both suggestions. <br /> Mr. Boles stated that the City currently sets entry-level wages at 25 percent <br /> below the final rate paid to the employee after years of service. He proposed <br /> that entry-level compensation be reduced to 35 percent below the market median <br /> for that position, so that an employee must work two more years than at <br /> present before reaching the highest rate of compensation. Ms. Norris replied <br /> that that would be a matter for negotiation with the City's unions. <br /> Mr. Gleason stated that the City's current employment situation is relatively <br /> satisfactory, and may not require serious modifications. <br /> ~ <br /> e MINUTES--City Council Work Session June 22, 1992 Page 3 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br />