My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/22/1992 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
06/22/1992 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 2:21:22 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:06:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> -- ------- <br /> e appropriations for the City of Eugene for the fiscal <br /> year beginning July 1, 1991, and ending June 30, <br /> 1992; and declaring an emergency. <br /> Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to amend Council Bill <br /> 4393 to include a transfer of $150,000 from General Fund <br /> Contingency to the Department of Public Safety. <br /> Mr. Boles said that it would be very helpful when such amendments are <br /> required to have the procedure documented for the benefit of the council. <br /> Mr. Boles indicated his intent to vote against the motion without more <br /> information about the long-range plan for addressing fire issues in the south <br /> hills. He pointed out that the current dry season was not unique and could <br /> recur, and asked if the council would continue to respond to such situations <br /> without a comprehensive examination of the the City's response to such an <br /> emergency. <br /> In response to Mr. Boles' remarks, Mr. MacDonald said that previous council <br /> discussion included agreement that there was a need for a comprehensive plan. <br /> He said staff had not been given further direction by council at that time, <br /> and indicated he would be willing to make a motion directing staff to bring <br /> back long-term issues for council discussion and resolution. Mr. MacDonald <br /> said that he believed it was too soon to expect to have a comprehensive plan <br /> in hand and expressed his satisfaction with the council's commitment. <br /> e Mr. Nicholson agreed with Mr. MacDonald that the council had committed to <br /> further discussion of the issue and asked Councilor Boles for more <br /> specificity about his objection to the motion. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said she would support the motion but had concerns regarding the <br /> City's ability to continue to meet service demands with state-of-the-art <br /> equipment. She suggested that the cost of addressing fire issues in the <br /> south hills was approximately the same as opening a new fire station, and <br /> said that it was difficult to justify such an expenditure to her <br /> constituents. <br /> In response to Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Boles said it was his hope that the council <br /> would have at this point a set of issues prepared by staff regarding the <br /> long-term response to fire hazard in the south hills. He suggested that, <br /> given the hazard, the council might wish to consider a moratorium on <br /> development or a change in standards for development in high-risk areas. The <br /> long-term operations and maintenance costs of state-of-the-art equipment <br /> referred to by Ms. Ehrman was another issue for the council to consider. <br /> Additionally, Mr. Boles said the council should discuss whether the cost of <br /> addressing such hazards should be borne by all citizens, or those responsible <br /> for creating the potential hazard. <br /> In response to Ms. Ehrman's remarks regarding the cost of equipment, Mr. <br /> Robinette pointed out that the equipment cost was a one-time expenditure, <br /> while the cost of a fire station was an ongoing expense. He said that for <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 22, 1992 Page 3 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.