My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/01/1992 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
07/01/1992 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:58:44 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:06:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/1/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Responding to a Question from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Childs said she was unaware of <br /> any other property owners in the same situation as Mr. Moorhead. . <br /> Responding to a Question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Moorhead said that Site 29 <br /> had been designated as residential land in 1976. Ms. Childs said that since <br /> that time, the property had been redesignated to industrial. <br /> Mr. Rust moved to initiate an amendment to the Metropolitan <br /> Area General Plan on behalf of the lane Board of County Com- <br /> missioners to redesignate Site 29 from industrial to low-den- <br /> sity residential. <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> Ms. Frazer asked staff why the plan amendment was considered major, rather <br /> than minor. Ms. Childs said that the amendment was considered a major amend- <br /> ment due to the size of the property and the proposed change in use. <br /> Mr. Boles expressed interest in knowing more about the history of the changes <br /> in designation on the property. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Cornacchia, Jacqlyn Mikalonis of lane Coun- <br /> ty discussed County staff resources available to process metropolitan issues. <br /> Ms. Childs indicated that Mr. Saul, representative for the applicant, had <br /> prepared much of the background information needed to process the request. <br /> Mr. Rust moved, seconded by Ms. Frazer, to initiate an amend- <br /> ment to the Metropolitan Area General Plan on behalf of the . <br /> lane Board of County Commissioners to redesignate Site 29 from <br /> industrial to low-density residential. <br /> Mr. Roberts expressed discomfort in voting for the motion due to a lack of <br /> information about the issue and ramifications of the decision. He encouraged <br /> the elected officials to make a commitment to address the issue. Mr. Roberts <br /> indicated he would support the motion if its failure meant that Mr. Moorhead <br /> would have to wait until January 1993 to initiate the plan amendment. <br /> . <br /> Mr. Cornacchia offered a friendly amendment to the motion, asking that it be <br /> modified to allow the applicant to initiate the plan amendment outside of the <br /> scheduled cycle at his own cost. Mr. Rust and Ms. Frazer accepted the amend- <br /> ment to the motion. <br /> The amended motion passed 4:1, Mr. Roberts voting no. <br /> Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to allow Mr. Moorhead <br /> to initiate a plan amendment to the Metropolitan Area General <br /> Plan outside the scheduled cycle for citizen-initiated amend- <br /> ments for the purpose of redesignating Site 29 from industrial <br /> to low-density residential. The motion passed unanimously, <br /> 5:0. <br /> MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials July 1, 1992 Page 6 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.