My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/27/1992 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
07/27/1992 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:08:37 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/27/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e B. EUQene Decisions: Results of Citizen InDut <br /> Barb Bellamy, City Manager's Office, said that the Council Committee on Eugene <br /> Decisions developed a process for working on a final strategy during August, <br /> which the council will have an opportunity to discuss on July 29. She said <br /> that will also provide the council with an opportunity to ask questions about <br /> the data presented this evening. She added that the committee will meet again <br /> on July 28 and can entertain questions and comments from the council then. <br /> Ed Weeks, University of Oregon, praised the collaborative effort on this <br /> project between the City of Eugene and the University of Oregon. He acknowl- <br /> edged the participation of Jennie Carmichael and Stephanie Buffum. <br /> Mr. Weeks described the methods used in gathering the data, saying that every <br /> Eugene citizen was offered an opportunity to participate and contribute ideas <br /> about service and funding strategies. The two sources of data used in this <br /> procedure were a tabloid questionnaire and a community workshop. The council <br /> also required a set of statistically representative data. There were two <br /> different instruments used for this purpose. The first of these was the <br /> budget-balancing instrument which presented to each respondent each of the <br /> elements included in the council strategy and allowed them the opportunity to <br /> construct a balanced budget from these components. The instrument was <br /> designed to avoid choosing mutually incompatible options. The other instru- <br /> ment presented the same basic information but in a multiple-choice format. It <br /> presented each respondent with the service changes included in each strategy <br /> and required the respondent to select that set of service changes they <br />e preferred to balance the budget. This format included information on the <br /> impact to the household from options chosen. <br /> Mr. Weeks said the response rate to the budget-balancing survey was 61 percent <br /> (10 percent better than expected) and twice as many tabloid questionnaires as <br /> those received the first time were returned. He said the margin of error <br /> rates are 6 percent for the multiple-choice survey and 4 percent for the <br /> budget-balancing survey. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Weeks said the data can be <br /> trusted because there is consistency of findings, which attests to a well- <br /> designed survey. <br /> Mr. Weeks described the findings, saying that respondents indicated the least <br /> support for balancing the projected shortfall solely through service reduc- <br /> tions, preferring a combination of service reductions and funding through new <br /> taxes and user fees. Strategy A received the most support. The instruments <br /> were consistent in reflecting how respondents chose to balance the budget. <br /> All showed approximately $3.5 million in cost reduction through efficiencies <br /> and cost savings and approximately $7.5 million raised with additional taxes. <br /> Mr. Weeks reviewed service changes, grouped into six major service areas. <br /> Under Public Safety services, there is support for reducing animal control <br /> field enforcement and eliminating the spay/neuter clinic. There was very <br />e <br /> MINUTES--City Council Work Session July 27, 1992 Page 2 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.