Laserfiche WebLink
arterial and collector streets to address that issue. He said the City’s financing program for assessments was <br />funded through bonds issued by the City and he did not think there was a statutory requirement to limit the <br />period to 10 years. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked for confirmation from staff that the financing period could be extended beyond 10 years. <br />He agreed that people who had to use a street other than the one they lived on to gain access to major <br />thoroughfares should be able to contribute to the cost of improvements, but requiring them to pay meant <br />they would pay for improvements to two streets and that was not fair. He was interested in developing a <br />voluntary participation process that was not to administratively burdensome, but not in compelling payment. <br />He asked for clarification of the city manager’s recommendation. Mr. Schoening said the recommendation <br />was to add the option of council-initiated improvements to local streets, not replace the poll petition process. <br />Mr. Ruiz said that option would allow the council to move proactively on local streets in the capital <br />improvement program (CIP) process if it desired instead of only responding to a poll. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark said he would be challenged by the idea of the council choosing a street, forming an LID and <br />assessing costs without the participation of property owners. He noted that the amount of unimproved roads <br />had increased from 48 miles in 2001 to 75 miles currently. Mr. Schoening said those roads had been <br />annexed into the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark said he was interested in how the process could be made more affordable to home owners. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor opined that some people paid more for street improvements than they paid for their property. <br />She did not believe that people on cul-de-sacs paid for the street as they purchased their home after the street <br />was constructed. She used Whitbeck Boulevard as an example of developers being allowed to build houses <br />after an overlay had been completed; the street was damaged by heavy equipment and those who had paid <br />for the overlay were left with a street in poor condition. She felt that flag lots should be assessed the same <br />as regular lots along the street because it was how they took access. She liked the concept of a travelshed. <br />She asked if the Crest Drive/Storey Boulevard/Friendly Street project would not proceed unless the bond <br />measure passed. Mr. Schoening said at this point the City’s share of the road improvements was not funded <br />and the project could not move forward. Mr. Ruiz said he was discussing with the neighborhood the option <br />of reclassifying streets in order to use SDCs for the City share. Mr. Schoening added that it could be paid <br />for in the capital budget only if another project was foregone. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said it did not seem there was sufficient cohesion to move forward with a motion. She said <br />funding the Crest Drive project could be discussed during the council’s consideration of a bond resolution. <br />She suggested reconvening the council’s subcommittee on transportation funding to examine the inequities in <br />the assessment policies. She asked for a memorandum from staff on how the code could be changed to <br />allow funding of an unclassified street. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon hoped the council would act thoughtfully, but expeditiously to address the matter of <br />assessments. She said the recommendations did not address street classification and LID limitation issues. <br />She asked if the recommendation to include unimproved streets in the CIP meant the entire cost of the <br />project or only the City’s share. Mr. Schoening said the idea was to initiate projects on local streets by <br />council action in order to being to reduce the 63 miles of unimproved streets; the CIP would front the cost of <br />the entire project, with the non-City portion to be assessed. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz remarked that many of the unimproved streets were in her ward and 70 percent of the residential <br />properties were rentals. Her challenge was not with street improvements, but with all of the improvements <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 23, 2008 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />