Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e Mr. Nicholson moved, seconded by Mr. MacDonald, to add communi- <br /> ty policing to the core at the cost of $500,000 the first year, <br /> with an additional $500,000 for each subsequent year until $2 <br /> million in FY97 is achieved, the dollars to be taken from <br /> operational efficiencies. <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, David Whitlow, Director of Public <br /> Safety, said that the long-range plan called for funding for human services <br /> agencies as a first priority. He anticipated that staff would recommend that <br /> $400,000 be directed toward contracts with those agencies to provide the types <br /> of services the CAHOOTS program provides at the present time. After that, he <br /> said staff would recommend that the council institutionalize such programs as <br /> Safer Schools and bicycle patrols, which occur now on an ad hoc basis. <br /> Mr. Robinette said he would like staff to respond to the realism of Mr. <br /> Nicholson's proposal before he supported the motion. Mr. Boles agreed. He <br /> pointed out that the total program costs were $4 million, not $2 million, <br /> noting that the $2 million was a compromise figure reached by the council in <br /> discussion of the community-oriented policing portion of the plan. <br /> Mr. Rutan indicated his agreement with the remarks made by Mr. Robinette and <br /> Mr. Boles. He said that the council should identify specific funding for the <br /> entire program rather than attempt to implement it on a piecemeal basis. <br /> Mr. MacDonald said that the issue was not one of funding alone, but the need <br /> to build community support for the program. He said for community policing to <br /> e work, the community must work with the police. Mr. MacDonald suggested that <br /> Mr. Nicholson's proposal would allow the City both to implement the program <br /> and educate the community about the program. <br /> Mr. Nicholson said he shared all the concerns that had been raised. He said <br /> there was a large majority of people who were not affected by community <br /> degradation to the degree that others were. Mr. Nicholson said that if the <br /> City did not implement the program and make progress in improving the day-to- <br /> day life of the community, it would have difficulty in "selling" an abstract <br /> concept like community policing. Further, Mr. Nicholson said he wished to <br /> illustrate the council's commitment to "doing things differently." He <br /> maintained that there were many areas the council could look to in order to <br /> realize $500,000 annually. He maintained that the council would have a more <br /> "sellable" package using such an approach. <br /> Mr. Boles said he would support the motion if it was the best the council <br /> could do. However, he disagreed that the issue was one of the "salability" of <br /> the final strategy, but rather about the council having the information to <br /> make the best decision for the community. <br /> Mr. Green indicated his opposition to the motion because he did not think the <br /> amount proposed would result in a high quality product. <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--City Council Work Session August 17, 1992 Page 8 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br />