Laserfiche WebLink
<br />S.Growtn StoUd!l - Councilwoman Beal inquired about the status of the growth study <br />referred to LCOG for report on dimensions al1d cost of such a study. Councilman <br />Williams, member of the LCOG subcommittee considering the request for a growth <br />study" reported makeup eX the subcommi ttee and said it was a good representation <br />of people concerned with growth of the metropolitan area. He said the majority <br />of the' subcommittee was of the opinion that for Eugene to conduct a study of this <br />nature on its own would be a grave error, that any such study should involve the <br />entire metropolitan area, and that attitudes of the County and Springfield as <br />well a~ other nearby governmental agencies should be known first. He was doubt- <br />ful tnat the work of the subcommittee would be completed hI} the original target <br />date of January 24. John Porter, planning director, added that a preliminary <br />budget for the work was scheduled for consideration of the I~OG Board at its <br />January 16 meeting after which a report would be returned to the member agencies. <br /> <br />T. Affirmative Action re: Females - Councilwoman Beal asked when the report she <br />previcusly requested on the city's affirmative action program with regard to <br />women would be submi tted. On being informed that a report was being prepared <br />in the personnel department based on a questionnaire distributed to women work- <br />ing for the city, Mrs. Beal wondered why that report was being prepared by per- <br />sonnel rather than Ms. Merck, the city's human rights officer for women. She <br />said she would like to have a report from Ms: Merck similar to one previously <br />submitted by Lew Peters, minority relations officer, speaking abOut accomplish- <br />ments of his office, a report giving Ms. Merck's overview of the city's position <br />at this time. <br /> <br />Manager explained that responsibility for the affirmative action program for the <br />ci ty lies wi th the personnel department, that Merck and Peters were responsible, <br />for working with personnel in implementation and direction of the affirmative <br />action program. However, their responsibility is primarily with the community, <br />developing programs with all employers of the city rather than just the city <br />organization itself. He said the questionnaire on which the personnel report <br />would ,be based was developed by Ms. Merck and that she was doing the followup <br />on actual work, but co-ordination of the total program was under persollnel be- <br />cause it was a personnel function. He added that Ms. Merck reported directly <br />to the manager's office, not personnel, so in order to keep the total affirmative <br />action program moving as a unit the administrative decision was to make it a <br />functipn of personnel. In response to Mrs. Beal's statement that Ms. Merck then <br />was doing the clerical work, Manager resonded that was not the case. Ms.Merck <br />designed the questionnaire in co-operation with personnel, but that was only one <br />portion of the city's affirmative action program. Ms. Merck was also working <br />with personnel, he said, in the areas of career development for women, salary <br />rates, etc., but personnel was responsible for making affirmative action reports, <br />gene~al supervision of the program, and recommending measures as necessary, to <br />keep the program moving - much more than just Merck's or Peters' portion of it. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal wondered if Ms. Merck was prepared to make any report on her work with <br />regard to status of, employment of women in the city or in the private sector. <br />Gary Long, personnel director, explained that Ms. Merck's research work was being <br />done to collect data on which to base efforts in working with other employers. <br />He said that portion should be completed and a report ready possibly by March 1. <br />Assistant Manager added that in addition to the time spent on the questionnaire, <br />Ms. Merck had been working on complaints involving sex discrimination, bringing <br />them to the Human Rights Commission, and working with private employers in the <br />city as well as with the city. The key to developing a program with regard to <br />problems involving women within the city, he said, was the questionnaire which <br />was being tabulated at this time. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal suggested that the report to be submitted should have the same format <br />as that which was originally submitted based on the Human Rights Commission re- <br />search project to give the opportunity for comparison. It was felt comparable <br />formats could be made available. <br /> <br />U. "Return of the Plague" an article appearing in Janu~ry 13,1975 issue of Time <br />was noted by Councilman Haws wherein Eugene, Oregon was mentioned as one of the <br />examples of smaller cities having rising incidence of addiction and heroin-related <br />crime. He wondered if the Council should be concerned. Mayor Anderson 'suggested <br />a rePDr:t from the police department might be of interest. <br /> <br />1/27/75 - 20 <br /> <br />'3(0 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Comm <br />1/15/75 <br />File <br /> <br />Comm <br />1/15/75 <br />File <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Cornm <br />1/15/75 <br />File <br /> <br />'./ <br />