My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/1975 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1975
>
01/27/1975 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:31:56 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:08:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/27/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley suggested that rezoning the area a~ this time might be pre- <br />mature, given the General Plan projectin over the next IS years. He thought <br />sequential zoning over the next IS years might be preferable. He inquired also <br />whether the property was within tpe flood plain. Mr. Saul answered that the <br />hesitancy over rezoning the property was requested by Mr. Safley was because of <br />the presence of Eugene Sand & Gravel. However, it had been established that <br />that operation would remain over the period of time covered by the General Plan. <br />He added that one problem with sequential zoning would be the treatment of prop- <br />erties on a piecemeal basis rather than development of an overall plan for the <br />entire area. He said the entire area was designated as a flood hazard area and <br />site review and planned unit development procedures were recommended require- <br />ments in order to establish floor elevations as required by the Federal government. <br /> <br />In response to Council members Haws and Shirey, Mayor Anderson explained pro- <br />cedure of requiring unanimous consent for second reading of a council bill in <br />order to adopt ordinances at this meeting. Councilman Bradley asked whether <br />the public hearing would be continued if the issue was carried over. Discussion <br />and conference with city attorney brought out that the hearing could be con- <br />tinued. If it was continued to a specific time, city attorney said, notification <br />requirements had been in compliance with the code and there would be no need for <br />further notice. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 712 - Rezoning to C-l PD Tax Lots 1002, 1200, and 1204 <br />north of Greenacres Road east of Delta Highway <br />was read by council bill number and title only, there being no council <br />member present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that findings supporting the re- <br />zoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of <br />October 28, 1974 and December 17, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto; <br />that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with <br />unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at <br />this time. Lacking unanimous consent - Council members Murray, Keller, <br />Beal, Williams, and Hamel voting aye; Council members Bradley, Haws, and <br />Shirey voting no - the bill was held over for second reading. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to continue the public hearing <br />on C.B.712 to the February 10,1975 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 713 - Changing Sign District on Lots 1002, 1200, and 1204 <br />north of Greenacres Road east of Delta Highway to <br />Integrated Neighbprhood Shopping was read by council bill number and title <br />only, there being no council member present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that findings supporting the re- <br />zoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of <br />October 28, 1974 and December 17, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto; <br />that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with <br />unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment:beconsidered at this <br />time. Lacking unanimous consent - Council members Murray, Keller, Beal, <br />Williams, and Hamel voting aye; Council members Bradley, Haws, and Shirey <br />voting no - the bill was held over for second reading. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to continue the public hearing on <br />C.B.713 to the February 10, 1975 Council Council meeting. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />1/27/75 - 5 <br /> <br />'2.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.