My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/10/1975 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1975
>
02/10/1975 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:36:12 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/10/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />L. Vacation of West 2nd Avenue between Jefferson and Madison, retaining l4-foot alley <br />(Jongeward-Howard)(SV 74-7) - Recommended by the Planning Commission on January 13,1975. <br />Manager noted staff review with regard to whether there should be assessment against <br />abutting properties for value of the land should the alley be vacated. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller to call public hearing on the <br />vacation request (March 24, 1975). Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />In response' to Councilman Haws, John porter, planning director, said notice of the <br />vacation request had been referred to the neighborhood organization in that area. <br /> <br />M. Resolution amenCing procedure establishing Council panel for hearing appeals on <br />street, sidewalk., and ,sewer assessments, and on decisions of the Zoning Code <br />Board of Appeals. <br /> <br />It was understood the resolution would be placed on the February 10 <br />consent calendar for approval. <br /> <br />N. <br />O. <br /> <br />Council Minutes December 9, 1974 as circulated <br /> <br />Appointment Pro Tem,Legislative Subcommittee - Mayor Anderson appointed Councilman <br />Keller to the Council legislative subcommittee, temporarily replacing Councilman <br />Williams while out of town over the next few weeks. <br /> <br />P. Appointment, Joint Parks Committee - A shift in assignments was announced by the Mayor. <br />Councilwoman Shirey was appointed to the Joint Parks Committee, replacing Councilman <br />Bradley. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />Proposal, Local Arts Commission - Copies of proposal for creation <br />City Local Arts Commission were previously distributed to Council <br />mitted by Alice Sachse, chairman of LCOG Arts Advisory Committee. <br />Murray's request the proposal was to be placed on the February 12 <br />for discussion, Mrs. Sachse to be invited to be present. <br /> <br />of a Lane Countyl <br />members as sub- <br />At Councilman <br />committee agenda <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />R. Community Development Task Force Report - Councilman Murray distributed copies of <br />interim report, asking Council members to review it for later discussion. He <br />said decisions were about to be made and now would be the time for Council input. <br />It was understood the report would be scheduled at the February 12 committee <br />meeting. <br /> <br />S. JOb-sharing Proposal was presen'ted by Counci+woman Beal. Copies of the proposal <br />were distributed as submitted by New Ways to Work, Eugene, which would provide <br />for split-time or double staffing city positions rather than layoff of full-time <br />employes. Mrs. Beal felt the proposal would be helpful for people with young <br />children in the home and others who would prefer to work on a part-time basis. <br />She thought it better to give two people part-time work instead of laying off <br />one and: keeping one. Councilwoman Shirey supported the plan as submitted. <br /> <br />At Mrs. Beal's request, the Mayor directed that the proposal be referred to staff <br />for recommendation and consideration at a future meeting. <br /> <br />T. <br /> <br />Growth Study - Discussion was continued from the January 29 committee meeting. <br />Councilwoman Shirey considered the study important and thought every possibility for <br />accomplishing it should be explored. She wondered if HUD funding had been lost. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley asked whether the 1990 Plan had been updated since its adoption <br />and how that updating would fit into a growth study, what priority would be placed <br />on the two. John porter, planning director, answered t~at the 1990 Plan had not, <br />been updated, that it 'ridS scheduleci on a five-year basis, and the growth study would <br />augment that work. He did not recommend updating the Plan without a growth study <br />but could not say whether the two should be done simultaneously or if a priority <br />should be placed. Bob Chave, LCOG staff, added that the updating of the Plan ob- <br />viously would be accomplished on the five-year basis. Some growth analysis would <br />have to be included in that updating but not to the extent a growth study woul~ <br />provide. <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />2/10/75 - 17 <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/75 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/75 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Approve <br />Comm <br />1/29/75 <br />Affirm <br /> <br />Comm <br />1/29/75 <br />Affirm <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/75 <br />Affirm <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/75 <br />Affirm <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/57 <br />Affirm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.