Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />from outlying jurisdictions or from the Federal government. Councilman Murray <br />said if the motion passed it would not automatically ensure financing, the issue <br />would have to go through normal budgeting process. He added that perhaps because <br />of present economic conditions now would be the appropriate time for such a study <br />because a great many people felt that growth was one of the things that contributed <br />most heavily to current economic dilemmas. He felt the costs of growing at the <br />rate Eugene was growing would go far beyond the projected cost of this study. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal said her concern all along had been the obligation to determine <br />the effect of growth on the taxpayers. The purpose of the study was to be able to <br />know the costs ahead of time, as any business or corporation would do, in order to <br />have a basis for making decisions as growth occurred. Councilman Keller appreciated <br />that viewoint, but felt that type of information would be obtained from people <br />qualified to develop it and he saw no relationship between that and a citizens <br />committee. A citizens committee, he said, could make a decision on a professional <br />opinion of what it costs the city to grow but in this case it was giving cause for <br />a report and then making it a political issue. Mrs. Beal answered that she realized <br />expert help was needed for compilation of data, a lot of which was now available, <br />but community representation was needed on the steering committee. She said there <br />was no intent on her part to inject any political or any particular social interests. <br /> <br />Manager raised the question of possible hazard if a majority of those making the <br />study were not elected or appointed officials and therefore not generally representa- <br />tive of the total community and were in disagreement with the elected officials who <br />with advice of appointed officials would have to make decisions on steps to implement <br />the study. In that event, a set of guidelines might be adopted by the steering com- <br />mittee which could really be a hurdle to implementation or progress toward whatever <br />direction the elected officials wished to take. There was also the question whether <br />LCOG was to have administrative responsibility for the project. If so, it would <br />seem LCOG should have responSibility for final selection of the project director. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray didn't share Manager's concern about the heazards of citizen <br />involvement even though procedure for appointing citizens was not spelled out in <br />the motion. He assumed they would be appointed by the jurisdictions involved and <br />to some degree that would reflect viewpoints of the elective bodies. With regard <br />to LCOG's role, he said he made no assumption one way or another in that regard. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson had serious concerns about the format which appeared to be developing. <br />He noted countless studies inVOlving greenway belts, urban service boundaries, etc., <br />which developed tools and techniques from which elected officials could reach con- <br />clusions regarding their communities. He thought this proposed study should produce <br />those tolls and techniques, also perhaps techniques whereby agreements could bring <br />adjacent jurisdictions into the picture. But it appeared to him, he said, to be <br />developing into a large political exercise if it proceeded along the lines it seemed <br />to be heading. He saw it as a long tedious task in any event. The Mayor also ex- <br />pressed concern about LCOG's role, saying it seemed to him that this was being pulled <br />away from LCOG by setting up a new organization concerned only with growth and leav- <br />ing LCOG with only the "nuts and bolts" of comprehensive planning in the community. <br />Cost was also a concern to him. To accomplish the study would take the co-opersation <br />of Lane County and Springfield, he said, and to do that the cost would have to be <br />reasonable. He agreed with Councilman Murray that the study could save many dollars <br />in the future, but at this time a program would have to be developed that was more <br />appealing and more sound administratively. <br /> <br />Referring to questions raised about appointment of a project director, Mayor Anderson <br />said it seemed an entirely new organization of governments was being created which <br />could go in any direction it wished. If that was the case, it appeared LCOG would <br />be.relieved of its respondibility and he felt their role too important not to be <br />involved. He suggested that the Council attempt to develop this proposal some <br />more, perhaps turning it back to the task force asking for a "cheaper model," or <br />perhaps having comment from the planning staff. <br /> <br />97 <br /> <br />2/24/75 - 29 <br />