Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />there should be some expedition in that decision making during the month of March <br />even if it meant a special meeting. Mr. Murray countered that it would be an <br />awkward situation which hypothetically could occur if action was promised on the <br />zone change and at the same time action on the study required amendment to the <br />General Plan which LCOG might not accept. Assistant Manager said nothing was being <br />promised so far as Commission action was concerned. Referral to the Commission <br />would simply be to ask for a recommendation under changed circumstances within a <br />reasonable time frame. In response to further questioning from Councilman Murray, <br />Assistant Manager said if it was determined the General Plan needed revision, the <br />earliest it could be referred to LCOG would be June or July. It would be a Commis- <br />sion decision whether to act on the zone change request or withhold action pending <br />Plan amendment. Mr. Murray could see nothing accomplished in that case, and Mr.Thorp <br />felt it would be continuing the moratorium "by another name." He repeated his con- <br />tention that a decision on the application had been continued beyond a reasonable <br />length of time and that there was an obligation to give the applicant an answer, one <br />way or the other. Also, that the decision should be made on the existing evidence. <br />To say the L&B report would have a bearing was speculation. He said the Council was <br />mandated by state law to zone in accordance with the city's comprehensive plan. <br />Further delay would only result in more legal and practical snarls than now exist. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley thought appropriate action would be referral to the Planning Com- <br />mission even though it might mean further delay for the applicant, there having been <br />a change in circumstances. Having to deal with the issue under both established <br />ordinances and the law requiring quasi-judicial procedure, he said, would require <br />public hearing where all the facts could be presented on which to base a decision. <br />Also, he thought the L&B report would be relevant, so the process should start over <br />again. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams recognized the problems in making a decision but he felt a deci- <br />sion should be made. When Mr. Murray countered that he failed to see the urgency <br />after the unusual delay to this time, Mr. Williams said when the study was ordered <br />the moratorium on zoning in that area was to last a year. It has now continued <br />substantially longer than that period of time, he said, and he felt an obligation <br />to give an answer. <br /> <br />Further discussion between Councilman Bradley and staff brought out that this was the <br />only zone change application for that area pending at this time, no others were <br />anticipated. The only other matter pending was an annexation request (Doerksen) <br />farther north of the subject property. The property covered by this application <br />(77 acres) was about 20% of the total Goodpasture Island area. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley suggested that a meeting between the Council and the Planning Com- <br />mission might be appropriate to determine the procedure. <br /> <br />Rules were re-established. <br /> <br />Mr. Keller moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the zone change request <br />(County AGT to C-2 PD on the Smith, Brown & Howell property) be removed <br />from the table. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Corom <br />2/26/75 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Further discussion centered on when the Council would take formal action with Mr.Keller <br />saying he would be absent from the March 10 meeting. However, he recognized that a <br />decision on any issue should not be delayed because some Council members might be absent. <br />Assistant Manager advised that existing evidence would include much more than minutes <br />of the Council meeting at which the issue was tabled. The entire record including <br />planning staff notes and minutes would be presented to the Council. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams had to leave the meeting but said he would favor reopening the <br />hearing before either the Planning Commission or the Council, but he would not want <br />to make a decision on the previous record alone. <br /> <br />Mr. Keller moved seconded by Mr,. Hamel to reconsider the zone change <br />request based on the existing record. <br /> <br />I Z J <br /> <br />3/10/75 - 17 <br />