Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />D. Amendment, Room Tax Ordinance - Copies of proposed amendment were previously <br />distributed to Council members. It would put the room tax ordinance into code <br />form. Also, it eliminates the room tax review committee, established originally <br />to work with the city administration in development of goals and procedures to <br />assure that the collection process of the hotel/motel room tax would be compatible <br />with the processes of the hotel/motel operators and to allow a method of give <br />and take between the operators and the admini.stration if disagreements arose'.' <br />about what was a reasonable process. Manager explained that the committee had <br />met once or twice after the orig.inal ordinance was written but had been inactive <br />since because of the city's good relationship with the operators themselves. <br />The amendment retains an appeal process from administrative procedures if needed. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/19/75 <br />Approve <br /> <br />It was understood the amendment would be on the March 24, 1975 <br />Council agenda for adoption. <br />E.Room Tax.Allocation Recommendations - February 17, 1975 - Copies of minutes of <br />the Room Tax Allocation Committee meeting together with report from the chair- <br />man were previously distributed to Council members recommending allocations to: <br /> <br />Altrusa Club for venetian blinds for international students <br />lounge on campus - $600 <br />Lane County Horsemen's Association - $500 <br />Central Lane Family YMCA for roof replacement - $17,740 <br /> <br />Councilman Murray expressed reservations about the YMCA allocation because he <br />considered the Y, having international affiliation, would have resources the <br />"go beyond Eugene." Also, he felt routine maintenance and repair didn't really <br />fall within the scope of the room tax fund. Carl DuBois, Y director, said the <br />Y was autonomous locally and did not have any outside financing. He said a <br />fee was charged to members, however, the majority of the service provided by the <br />Y was to the general public and for that reason he felt it would fall within the <br />guidelines for room tax allocations. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilman Haws asked how it would meet the criteria for not teaching or expound- <br />ing any religious ideology. Councilman Williams answered that he had served for <br />many years on the Y board of directors, and while it had the name "Christian" <br />and attempted to be a Christian organization, there was no religious teaching in <br />the sense of a church in its programs. He said when the Y was built it was the <br />only community facility available, land for the building t.,as provided by the <br />school district. He felt the city was not involved in similar kinds of services <br />in many different areas. Although the Y charged fees, he said, they were a small <br />part of the total budget for providing their services, and no one was denied <br />the opportunity of participating. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve the allocations <br />as recommended. <br /> <br />In making the motion, Councilman Murray expressed the reservation about getting <br />into the position of making major allocations from room tax revenues for capital <br />projects. Mayor Anderson agreed and thought the Room Tax Allocation Committee <br />should keep in mind the source of monies involved and that consideration should <br />be given recreational and cultural type activities that would generate more <br />revenues for the establishments collecting the room tax. Art Fairchild, chairman <br />of the committee, said they were well aware of this. He added that the roof for <br />the Y was an emergency situation, it had to be replaced or the Y would have lost <br />everything it had. Manager said too that capital projects in the past had not <br />been considered inappropriate, calling attention to the construction of an <br />auditorium as the major reason for initiating the tax, and past allocations for <br />track improvements, etc. He said staff's major concern with this particular <br />allocation was whether it met the criteria that the funds should not be used for <br />debt retirement. That was the reason it was sent back to the committee when it <br />was originally recommended, but the committee said they felt it should not be <br />considered debt retirement. <br /> <br />\"!.; <br /> <br />3/24/75 - 7 <br />