Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilman Williams said he did not oppose the resolution but he seriously <br />questioned whether the outcome would be a completed document that would <br />be satisfactory from both a legal and philosophical or practical stand- <br />point. He ~hought this a good starting point - to determine the variouS <br />things that were already being done - if the intent of the resolution as <br />it said was to assess economic costs of limiting growth and limiting the <br />processes of growth. Councilwoman shirey also wanted to get the study <br />started. . She hoped that part of the data collected would support the <br />need for plans and statistics from other communities. She didn't think <br />the cost of growth or the rate of growth could be determined if those <br />statistics were not available. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Assistant.. Manager cautioned the Council about economic studies based on <br />population figures, saying population projections coming from this pro- <br />posal would not be any more valid than what was now availa.ble. In addi- <br />tion, uncertain economic conditions would further cloud the issue. He <br />said it was an extremely nebulous affair and he thought the city would <br />be ahead by looking at what had succeeded in,other communities. <br /> <br />Councilman Keller found the resolution as presented acceptable from a <br />cost standpoint. He could see where it would fit into budgetary limita- <br />tions, and the information being sought still had to do with economic <br />costs. He agreed that MAPAC was best suited to give the answers because <br />to do the work there would have to be co-operation from other juriSdic- <br />tions. Councilman Bradley supported the idea of the growth study and to <br />a certain extent was in favor of this resolution. His reservations were <br />tied to the recent court case he brought up, and he said if there was as- <br />surance the Council would have the opportunity to take another action <br />later on, he would vote for adoption of the resolution. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray took exception to the fact that the Council had not been <br />informed that the LCOG Board at its January 1975 meeting took the stand <br />that any growth study should be limited to the metropolitan area. He <br />found it abhorent that the Council would be allowed to debate that issue <br />when "some people party to the [LeOG] action had not taken the trouble to <br />notify the Eugene Council of that." He said that was not something that <br />was conducive to confidence and good faith. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion to adopt the resolution as <br />presented. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />A prepared statement endorsing the proposed growth study was entered into the <br />record by .the League of Women Voters. <br /> <br />D. Wayne Morse Property - Council members on tour viewed the Morse ranoh prop- <br />erty, and copies of preliminary report from the parks department were dis- <br />tributed. Assistant Manager explained that a proposal for acquisition of <br />the property was before the State Legislature and that Councilwoman Shirey <br />had requested Council discussion. He reviewed parks department cost estimate <br />fo~ low-level maintenance and program approach until a master plan was de- <br />veloped for the property, and the eventual operational budget impact. A cost <br />of $3,750 was estimated just for beginning services, assuming city opera- <br />tion.for three months of the 1975-76 year. Costs for the first full year <br />of operation, 1976-77, were estimated at $19,725, and for the next year, <br />$34,125. Assistant Manager cautioned that those figures would no doubt <br />be higher when taking inflationary factors into consideration. Costs <br />from then on would depend on the purposes for which the property was used. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4/28/75 - 20 <br /> <br />ZZ$ <br />