Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />on policy .with regard to their use and procedure for installation. Although there would <br />be contro~ersy, he said, it was a good tool and one needed in the community. <br />Resolution No. 2414 - Adopting traffic diverter policy and procedures - <br /> was read by number and title. <br />Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. <br />Councilman Murray recognized heated differences of opinion on the use of traffic di- <br />verters, yet he felt their use was an extension of existing policy adopted in community <br />goals statements - to increase efforts to improve neighborhood quality by directing <br />traffic to commercial and industrial streets, serve the needs of motorists without sub- <br />verting other aspects of city life, limit traffic to as few streets as possible, dis- <br />courage through residential areas, etc. His concern was excessive traffic in residential <br />neighborhoods, especially since it tends to be heaviest in older neighborhoods de- <br />preciating the quality of those areas. He didn't think quality in those areas would <br />be improved unless strong steps were taken, and from consultations with traffic people <br />his information was that traffic diverters were the best known method of accomplishing <br />the desired protection. He saw them as a device to bring to the older neighborhoods <br />with grid street systems the same protection that was being provided newer areas. He <br />felt that if this policy and procedure were adopted it would provide a more standardized <br />way of dealing with the issue, a better job could be done so far as designing and placing <br />diverters than is now the case. <br />Councilman Williams agreed with Mr. Murray's statement that he saw the primary value <br />was to provide protection for residential streets adjacent or very near to major <br />arterials suffering from spillover of traffic, but he said he didn't read this <br />traffic diverter policy in that way. He didn't think it dealt with alternative means <br />of transportation. Assistant Manager said the policy would relate to reducing through - <br />traffic and improving residential neighborhoods. It also would to a degree become a <br />component in neighborhood refinement plans but not in the sense of making broad, <br />sweeping delcarations with regard to alternative modes of transportation. It would <br />put traffic on arterials and perhaps will require an arterial street policy statement <br />in time. <br />Councilman Bradley favored the policy statement, although he expressed disappointment <br />that more neighborhood associatiansdid not respond since that was the source of citizen <br />feedback. <br />Councilman Williams questioned Assistant Manager remarks, wondering if staff felt <br />adoption of this policy would proviqe the basis for an overall workable transportation <br />system. He saw it only as a portion of the community goals statements and said there <br />was a need for a broader overall policy. He wondered if adoption of this policy would <br />be creating a situation of not adopting a broader approach with regard to diverters <br />later on. Assitant Manager didn't think so. He thought it would increase pressure <br />on the Council to address the overall policy issues because the diverters would place <br />traffic seeking alternate routes on arterial streets. This policy, he said, could be <br />modified when those overall decisions were made. <br />Councilwoman Beal agreed there were broader issues to be considered. Property owners <br />on both residential and commercial streets were more or less penalized by increased <br />traffic, those in residential areas not only by having the increased traffic but also <br />for street improvements to accommodate it. She thought this diverter policy should be <br />considered only a part of the overall issue, a temporary thing. Councilman Murray <br />agreed that installation of diverters would not be a panacea. But he felt arterial - <br />uses were having a tremendously dibilitating effect on some residential neighborhoods, <br />and however much traffic the diverters added to the arterials would not significantly <br />change the overall problem. He said he didn't think diverters would solve the problems, <br />but neither would tney make them dramatically worse. <br />6/23/75 - 6 '33~ <br />