My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/16/1975 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1975
>
07/16/1975 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:29:12 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:12:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/16/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Maxwell, however, would be unable to develop his property without city <br />services, he said, and since it appeared the property eventually would become a <br />part of the city because of its location and nature, now seemed an appropriate <br />time to annex. .- <br /> Fechtel continued that the area was within the urban service area, <br />Mr. sewer <br />service would provide the opportunity for development thereby adding an industrial <br />area to the city's tax base, proposed development would conform to the General <br />Plan diagram, other city services are available, and the area would create no <br />burden on park and school systems. In fact, he said, there was no adverse state- <br />ment by the planning staff with regard to this annexation. He said that the Lane <br />County Health Division has indicated future growth in that area would depend on <br />sewers because of marginal conditions and high water tables. Existing homes there <br />could be expected to experience sewage problems during high water seasons. <br />Mr. Fechtel thought the reasons for annexing this property were overwh~lming <br />and the only stated reason for denying the petition was the fact that remonstrances <br />were anticipated. He noted that SP land had as recently as last year received addi- <br />tional service even though it lies outside the city. He urged favorable action on <br />the petition for annexation, saying it was proper and should occur at this time. <br />Those opposing the annexation were Paul Hoffman, 2177 Elysium Street, representing <br />"voters who oppose the annexation;" John Rodda, 975 Oak Street, attorney repre- I-A-2 <br />senting Cabax Mills; Dan Deschamps, 2235 Azure, representing Boise Cascade; and <br />Ken Herber, tax agent for Southern Pacific. For the most part their objections <br />were because they felt sewers would be of no benefit to their properties. They <br />were already adequately served with septic tank systems and other services that <br />would be provided through annexation; annexation would increase taxes at a time <br />when the lumber industry was experiencing a "slump." Mr. Herber said that SP <br />was satisfied with the present level of municipal services in view of the more e <br />than $1 million tax bill paid each year to Lane County, much of which goes to <br />the city. <br /> Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented <br />. Assistant Manager commented that not many of SP's tax dollars come to the city <br />of Eugene. He said that the basic question was whether to recommend annexation <br />of the entire area, and from staff's standpoint there were not strong reasons <br />to indicate this area should not come in to the city. However, residents in <br />the area are opposed and staff felt they could petition an election on the issue, <br />incurring public expense, and dispose of the issue by vote. With regard to the <br />Maxwell property, he said, staff is averse to recommending a policy change that <br />would permit extension of sewers-to that property through contractual arrangement. <br />In response to Councilman Haws with regard to criteria on which judgment in this <br />matter was made, Assistant Manager said the criteria used in considering ~ny <br />annexation request was used. The city has no authority to mandate an annexation, <br />he said, when it was neither an enclave nor a health hazard annexation. <br />Mr. Chenkin explained that property petitioned for annexation is checked to make <br />usre it is within the urban service area close to city limits, city services <br />are available, resulting taxes will cover cost of urban service extension, etc. <br />The General Plan is also checked, he said, to determine whether conflicts would <br />develop with regard to land use or problems with extending services to the result- <br />ing city boundary line. Assistant Manager added, in further response to Council- <br />man Haws, that the Maxwell property would fit very well within the urban boundary <br />considering, Belt Line Road as the dominant boundary. Also, that the enlarged -- <br />area included about 14 residences. Don Allen, public works director, also in <br />response to Councilman Haws, said that the only city service Southern Pacific <br />has other than water service is access to the sewer system at the south end of <br />Polk Street. Also, SP has been assessed and has paid for sewer installed on <br />Bethel Drive. <br />7/16/75 - 2 3SS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.