Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> volved removal of more trees and all larger than permitted. Overall, he said, the <br /> ordinance has provided the opportunity to prevent wholesale clearing of property <br /> when construction was anticipated thereby saving landscaping and sometimes specimen <br />e trees. He said one problem remaining to be worked out is a process whereby the <br /> parks depact:!lc'nt ~'(J'.11d be ,H.J.lrc ot'" ~v'!l0ther t:rc....cs ~\Tere i rJ:'~) 1 ~/.;_l;! ~''/..:'>=:'~-: :":;:; :'l:i.i.ng ~;:!:"'_ <br /> m.l. ts we;:'e iSSU2d_ <br /> In response to Councilwoman Shirey's suggestion for a building department requirement <br /> to show trees on a property when building plans were submitted, Mr. Smith said that <br /> possibility would be investigated. He said a public information program was being <br /> initiated - brochures were being mailed to all builders, contractors, etc. - to make <br /> people aware of the ordinance and in that process in time building plans could in- <br /> clude a requirement with regard to trees. Assistant Manager noted that such a re- <br /> quirement would call for modification of the ordinance. <br /> Councilwoman Shirey asked if there was any estimate of how many peopl~ had cut up <br /> to four or five trees, noting five trees or more required the permit. She wondered <br /> whether that limit should be lowered to three or four. Mr. Smith said he felt the <br /> five-tree limit was very effective. He noted quite a few places were visited <br /> where the number of trees removed was within the legal limit and permitted proper <br /> development of the property. He said the master street tree ordinance now being <br /> prepared could take care of isolated instances. The workload in the parks depart- <br /> ment, he said could be increased as much as 60% if the limit was lowered. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Murray that a Council committee be <br /> appointed to look into the question of street trees as suggested <br /> in the parks department memo. <br />e Mr. Murray suggested this item might better be referred to the Joint Parks Committee, <br /> that it could be given a high priority in that committee. Mr. Smith said the street <br /> tree ordinance would be ready for that type of review soon. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved instead second by Mr. Murray to refer the street Comm <br /> tree ordinance and possible modification of tree cutting ordinance 7/9/75 <br /> permit limits to the Joint Parks Committee. Motion carried unanimously Approve <br /> T. Community School Program, Advisory Committee - Copies of a revision in makeup of the <br /> committee proposed by School District 4J were distributed to Council members with the <br /> agenda. The proposal would call for at least 12 and as many as 15 members on the <br /> committee - five continuous members (City Council, School Board, City Manager or <br /> designee, School Superintendent or designee, city staff member representing com- <br /> munity centers); two at-large pQsitions on three-year alternating terms; com- <br /> munity school representatives on two-year alternating terms (five filled by princi- <br /> pals or neighbors involved in designated community school; three additional princi- <br /> pals or neighbors involved in designated community school; at least 50% to be lay <br /> people other ~han school district or community school staff). Comm <br /> 7/9/75 <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to approve the proposed Approve <br /> membership revision as presented. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> U. Right-of-way Acquisi tion <br /> 1. 28th Avenue sidewalk - John w. and Myrtle M. Easley, 1130 West 28th - $150 <br /> Ethel M. Baker, 1000 West 28th Avenue - $880 <br />e ,1. Barger Drive - James and Evelyn Burke (17-04-17-1400) - $1,625 Corom <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to authorize property acquisi- 7/9/75 <br /> tion as requested. Motion carried unanimously. ;'.pprove <br /> 4-ofD. . 7/16/75 - 23 <br />