Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> leading. He said he didn't recall once making a decision on land use <br /> or any other factor where the assumption that the West Amazon Parkway <br /> at the proposed location or anywhere else was part of the deli:1}eration. <br />- Mr. Murray added that a second problem clouding the issue was the ques- <br /> tion of the arterial route. He questioned whether the route proposed <br /> at this time - along the Amazon channel - would improve the existing <br /> traffic situation. He wanted the opportunity to ex~lore with the Planning <br /> Commission in greater detail various options for the route before making <br /> any decision on whether to go ahead with the study. <br /> Councilwoman Beal wanted to wait until the ESATS update was completed <br /> to have the benefit of that work as a basis on which to decide this arter- <br /> ial issue. Councilman Bradley sUPPorted that viewpoint on not only <br /> the east/west arterial but also the proposed 30th and Hilyard intersec- <br /> tion improvement. <br /> Assistant Manager said that could be done if the Council wished but the <br /> difficulty was that land use decisions, the 1990 Plan, existing zoning <br /> had defined as acceptable those residential areas. Property o"'mers having <br /> a right to use their properties as currently zoned created a transporta- <br /> tion demand through this spec.ific corridor that required a solution. <br /> This study was not choosing any particular route, it addressed only the <br /> options for solving the transportation demands that were there. Each of <br /> the options would have an impact, he said, and if nothing was done there <br /> would have to be changes in the land uses creating the demand. He said <br /> again that more discussion with the Planning Commission could be scheduled <br /> if the Council was not ready to make judgment to proceed-l.,ith the study <br /> o.f alternatives, but staff would like some sense of where the concerns <br /> were so they could be addressed. <br />e Councilman Murray wanted it clear that his concern was not the one expressed <br /> at the joint meeting on the 23rd - that the first concern should be preser- <br /> vation of the green belt along the Amazon, then worry later about an <br /> east/west transportation facility. He said he l.,as concerned about the need <br /> for the facility and he was ready to look at some alternates, but he was <br /> not interested in widening existing streets. He wanted to discuss fur- <br /> ther in more detail some of the specific ways an expressway might be <br /> provided so as to have more information on which to base a decision about <br /> whether it was worth the study. <br /> Murray-Williams to schedule a joing meeting with the Planning Comm <br /> Comndssion at which questions could be more fully explored, in- 6/25/75 <br /> eluding in this motion the intent to provide the opportunity Affirm <br /> at some point for public input if there is interest in explor- <br /> ing the project further~ Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Assistant Manager inquired whether Council would want to have study sessions <br /> for the hour prior to committee-of-the-who1e meetings where single specific <br /> items could be handled without hampering the normal flow of Council <br /> business. There were no objections. Assistant Manager asked that Council <br /> members express specific concerns, especially on the West Amazon study, <br /> so staff would have the opportunity to gather the necessary information <br /> and share it with others ahead of time. <br /> 30th/Hilyard Intersection Improvement - West Amazon Corridor Study - Assistant Comm <br /> Manager advised that public hearing on the 30th and Hilyard intersection im- <br /> provement would be set for the July 28th Council meeting because of the heavy 7/9/75 <br />e hearing schedule on the 14th. In response to Councilman Murray, he said the See <br /> Amazon route would probably be discussed with the planning Commission at an Action <br /> 11:00 a.m. committee-of-the-whole session in view of the present heavy Commission p.B <br /> agendas. Mrs. Beal wondered if the Planning Commission would have to consider <br /> the Amazon Parkway issue before discussing it wi th the Council. Assistant <br /> Manager answered that staff understood the Council wanted to go over the issue <br /> jointly with the Commission before public hearing was set. <br /> 4-o~ 7/16/75 .,. 25 <br />