Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> operates with a hearings officer for conditional use permi ts., and there is underway <br /> a study to determine whether consideration of PUDs also should be hdndled by a <br /> hearings office. <br /> .- Councilwoman.Shirey wondered whether use of a hearings officer in reviewing PUDs <br /> should be considered in conjunction with zone changes. She thought information <br /> gathered on consideration of PUDs would be useful in discussing zone changes. <br /> Assistant Manager said they could be combined but in discussions the issue would still <br /> come down to whether the Council wished each individual thing to be handled by a <br /> hearings official or by the Council. He noted the current use of a hearings offi- <br /> cial on conditional use permits was working very well. <br /> Mayor Anderson thought these policy issues could lead to some long drawn-out discus- <br /> sions. He suggested use of a questionnaire containing six to eight basic questions <br /> to be circulated among Council members to give some direction rather than debating <br /> the many issues involved. He felt a lot of time could be saved if the basic <br /> questions presented in the staff memo were answered, points of disagreement dis- <br /> tinguished, then discussion on the major points of disagreement. <br /> Councilman Bradley recognized the expediency of the suggested procedure but thought <br /> it "healthy" for dialogue to take place. Mayor Anderson said it was not his intent <br /> to eliminate full discussion, only to identify the major areas of disagreement first <br /> in an attempt to organize discussion more adequately. <br /> Councilman Bradley saw the issue only as whether the hearings off.icer or the <br /> Council would consider rezoning requests. That was the main issue, he said, <br /> the policy issue, and if a decision was made on that, subsidiary issues could <br /> then be considered. Councilman Murray didn't think it was thJt simple, that a <br /> "yes" or "no" answer on what Mr. Bradlelj considered the main issue miLfht not be <br /> so clear-cut. He agreed with t he need for full discussion but thought some de- <br /> vice to serve as a starting point, to focus discussion, would be useful. <br /> e Mr. Bradley said d.ialogue could be tailored to the four questions presented in <br /> the staff.memo. <br /> Councilwoman Beal noted the importance of zoning as an integral part of good <br /> planning. She hoped there would be co-ordinaction and input- from the planning <br /> staff .in r;eaching a decision because of the importance of this issue to general <br /> planning. <br /> <-. <br /> Councilman Murray asked for clarification of the term "Council review" as it ap- <br /> plied to decisions made by the hear.ings officer. Stan Long, assistant city <br /> attorney, said it depended upon what the Council wanted to do when looking at <br /> appeals from decision of the hearings officer - reserve the right of hearing <br /> appeals, look at the decisions again, review for errors, if so what kind, etc. <br /> Assistant Manager said his understanding was that the Council would not review <br /> decisions of the hearings officer unless parties in a zone change process filed <br /> an appeal. The Council may wish to be able to reconsider a matter on its own <br /> initiative after reviewing a hearings officer's decision. He added that at one <br /> point in discussions on the proposed change the Planning Commission had indicated <br /> it wanted the ability to enter into the review process on matters coming to the <br /> Council from the hearings officer. <br /> Mayor Anderson suggested again that the staff poll Council members as to their <br /> opinions on certain aspects regarding use of a hearings officer. Also, ask <br /> Council members to submit individually what they think might be the most <br /> critical development of such a program, recognizing that answers the Council <br /> was giving were preliminary only to bring out their thinking without taking up <br /> meeting time. <br /> e Councilman Haws wondered if the material would be prepared by the next committee <br /> meeting. Mayor Anderson didn't see that much urgency, the city had been function- <br /> ing without a hearings officer on zone changes for some time. Assistant Manager <br /> said it would depend upon the type of poll decided upon, individual interviews <br /> may be desirable. Staff would want time to work on it. <br /> -4-29 7/28/75 - 11 <br />