07/28/1975 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B. Liquor Licenses - New Outlets". k . The Hofbrau or Rod's Hofbrau, l6S'Silver Lane (RMBi - submitted by James Hansen and Rodney Hager. GLCC report indicated six in the neighborhood objected to the l':'cense, seven nonobjectors, and f.our noncommittal. . PearlSrreet Station, 412 Pearl Street (RMB) - submitted by Robert Lou:s and MarnaLouise Elliott, Leighton H. and Judith A. Taylor, and Bob Wynia. GLCe report noted two objectors, three nonobjec:ors. . ./. Mr. Murray moved second by Mr: Wili~c'ms to schedule public hearing on the two applica.tions at the July 28 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. l. I 165 Silver Lane (RMB) Rod,' s Hofbrau, Staff had no objections. OLCC reported that six of thosinterviewed in the vicinity of the proposed establishment objected, seven did not, and four were noncommittal. Public hearing was opened. James A. Hansen, partner in the establishment, and Bob Poppin, 1908 Carmel Avenue, leasing agent, spoke in favor of the application. They felt there was definite need in the area for a family type outlet serving food, beer, and wine; it would be located in an established center and developed under site review procedures; traffic generated would be similar to that for restaurant use. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. I-A-l Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Williams to recommend approval e of the application. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Pearl Street Station, 412 Pearl Street (RMB) Staff had no objections. OLCC reported that two of those in the vicinity of the~proposed establishment interviewed objected, three did not. Public hearing was opened. . Scott Taylor, P.O. Box 427, Veneta, presented a petition signed by owners of seven other outlets in the area opposing issuance of this license on the basis that there were sufficient tavern type outlets now in that area, there was no demonstrated demand for another outlet, public interest and convenience were already served, population density was too low in that locality to justify additional licensed premises. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Williams to recommend approval of the application. Councilman Murray in making the motion said the petition appeared to be an attempt to limit competition rather than citing legitimate reasons for not permitting the license. Mr. Taylor answered that it was an attempt to point out the number of existing establishments in that area providing the same privileges proposed for the new outlet. It was his understanding that was one of the criteria to be met in considering new outlets. - Vote was taken on the motion to recommend approval. Motion carried unanimously. 7/28/75 - 2 4-Z0: